Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 January 2016

PLEASE SHARE THE NEWS ABOUT GUANTANAMO - SHUT DOWN THIS OBSCENE PLACE - THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT




World Can't Wait | January 5, 2016
IN 2002, the Bush regime set up a primitive prison camp at the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Over six years they held 776 men there without charges, using what they called “enhanced interrogation” and the rest of the world calls “torture.” Bush called these men “the worst of the worst,” though most had been turned in for $5,000 cash bounties the U.S. paid, and had no connection to attacks on the U.S. An international outcry brought about the release of more than 500 of the prisoners.

Torture is a war crime, and a crime against humanity.

International and U.S. law prohibit torture, under any and all circumstances, without exception. If we fail to hold our government and its officials accountable for the American torture state they have constructed, we are condoning that torture and it will continue to occur.
The systemic abuse witnessed at Guantanamo is sustained by a culture of impunity. High government officials responsible for wars of aggression and conspiracy to commit torture walk free, unrepentant and boldly advocating for more of the same.

Why is Guantanamo still open?

And what can we do to close it?

Evidence against some prisoners is tainted, usually because of a tortured confession. There is no legal way to get a conviction. Political calculation notwithstanding, in a free and just society, anyone detained by the government must be charged and given a fair trial, or released. And that won’t happen by the secret military tribunal system that President Obama has established to replace real justice.
The U.S. commander-in-chief has authority, independent of Congressional approval, to close the hated prison camp with the stroke of a pen. It’s up to us to make that happen.

On January 11, 2016, the U.S. torture camp at Guantanamo will have been open 14 years.

One of Obama’s first acts as president in 2008 was to order closure of Guantanamo within one year, leading most people to think the terrible practice of preemptive incarceration without trial is over. But it isn’t.
105 men are still held, 46 of whom are cleared for release. They suffer the Obama administration’s policy of indefinite detention. An unknown number of hunger strikers are being force-fed in violation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture.
The closure of Guantanamo Bay Prison Camp can’t wait. The abomination of U.S. torture must not only end; the rationale of “exceptionalism” — that American lives are worth more than others — must be repudiated.

Guantanamo: how will WE be judged?

Our government has done its best to hide the torture practiced at the experimental off-shore prison camp and forestall any attempts at accountability for the perpetrators and enablers of those crimes. But thanks to a courageous and ongoing hunger strike by prisoners, Obama was forced to condemn extrajudicial punishment.
Protestations of executive “my hands are tied” impotence are no longer plausible. It is up to us to demand closure of Guantanamo and repudiation of the lawlessness exhibited there.

When IGNORE–ance = death, silence is not an option

“The president knows that Guantanamo is wrong, legally and morally,” says Wells Dixon, senior attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, who has represented clients at Gitmo since 2005. “But the failure to ensure accountability for the sins of the prior administration is like trying to avoid treatment for mental illness with the hope that it will go away,” he says. “The more you ignore it, the more it comes back to haunt you.”
The President and Congress have responded to prisoner demands with callous disregard for basic legal and human rights. Murder by neglect... is this the end of the line? Will people living in the United States accept this version of history? Or will we step up to the task at hand and close down Guantanamo once and for all?

TORTURE + SILENCE = COMPLICITY! ACT NOW TO STOP TORTURE!

Saturday, 28 February 2015

Bernie Sanders, The Pope and economic disparity

Cross-posted with permission from Advocacy at St Paul's

Senator Bernie Sanders is a bit of a political institution in the USA where he sits in the Senate. He is an independent but for many practical situations, he counts as a Democrat. 

The speech below begins in relation to the planned visit of Pope Paul to speak from America's seat of government. Please take time to listen to Senator Sanders and the economic statistics he quotes. His statistics relate to the USA but the spirit of them is the same for Australia. The convergence of finance and resources towards the top minuscule per cent away from the bottom majority. 

Bernie Sanders asks:  
What religion condones this type of economic disparity? 

The question we should be asking of ourselves is:
Should we be asking that question of our political leaders who profess to belong to and practice various faiths? 


Monday, 10 June 2013

As the USA takes a greater interest in the Asia-Pacific region, how will it/can it use the base Australia has given to it in Darwin?

Thanks to Dale Hess for this article:


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Malcolm Fraser 

warns of US attacks 

launched from Darwin

Former PM says Australian foreign policy is 'complacent' 
and leaves country hostage to American decisions
guardian.co.uk
Malcolm Fraser
Malcolm Fraser. Photograph: Tess Peni/Rex Features

The former prime minister Malcolm Fraser has launched a wide-ranging attack on Australia’s “complacent” foreign policy, accusing the government of being harmfully dependent on the US.

In a speech delivered at Melbourne University, Fraser said he was “ashamed” that Australia was led into theIraq war on “falsehoods” and criticised the current deployment of American troops in Darwin.
Around 2,500 American troops began rotating through Darwin for training last year, with US marines set to bring equipment such as amphibious assault craft, jets and helicopters to Australia, in a bid to enhance the USmilitary position in the region.

Fraser, who was Liberal prime minister between 1975 and 1983, said this was an example of a damaging imbalance in the US-Australian relationship.

He said Australia was “hostage to the decisions of a country 10,000 miles away”.

He added: “And they aren’t going to say ‘Canberra, we don’t like what people are doing here and we want to attack them and we want to use those forces you’ve so conveniently housed in Darwin.’

“They’ll do it and we’ll read about it in the newspapers. Our prime minister will be told about it after the attack is made. Because that’s the way these things work. That, for me, is a total denial of Australian sovereignty and if we were ever independent, it’s a denial of Australian independence.”

Fraser said that Australia should be wary of “not very good” US foreign policy in the Middle East and northern Africa being replicated in the Asia-Pacific region, urging the government to forge an independent identity forAustralia that focused more on engaging with neighbouring nations.

“We are a complacent nation when it comes to foreign affairs,” he said. “Since the end of the cold war and the failure of the Soviet Union, our ties to the US have become closer and closer than ever before.
“Today, the United States has influence over our armed forces. Influence might be the wrong word – the right word may be control. Our armed forces could only operate if the United States approved, because otherwise we’d have no communications. I don’t think that’s very comfortable.”

Fraser warned that Australia risked being marginalised, rather than strengthened, by being enmeshed in US foreign policy goals, with regional powers such as Indonesia becoming increasingly important to Washington.
“The largest Islamic country in the world would rate highly in the priorities of the United States,” said Fraser. “20 million Australians? Not so highly.”

“I know of three occasions where the United States has chosen Indonesia over Australia, which no Australian government will ever proclaim because they think we have a special relationship. Special relationships with great powers just don’t exist. Great powers have their own interests.
“It’s time Australia stood up and learned to be independent. To have no external entanglements that would stop it making up its own mind.”

In recent years Fraser has become an outspoken critic of both the government and the Liberal party, which he quit in 2009, on issues such as the treatment of asylum seekers and Australia’s military involvement in Iraq andAfghanistan.

He reiterated this stance in his Melbourne University speech, saying: “In the second Iraq war there were three nations involved and I’m ashamed to say Australia was one of them. And they went to war on a falsehood.

“[Chief UN weapons inspector] Hans Blix wasn’t allowed to finish his job, because if he had, he would’ve shown there were no weapons of mass destruction.”

He also took aim at the Australian mainstream media for not highlighting the Australian army general Richard Burr’s recent appointment as the second in command of US Pacific operations.

“The announcement was made by the [US] secretary for the army, John McHughand wasn’t published in the Australian - but it was by the Guardian, in England,” he said.

He said the appointment was “another way of tying us into decisions that they make and makes us complicit in whatever they do”.

“The senior American military people, as the British before them, are very good at making people feel important. It flatters lesser powers and some people are not immune to the consequences of that,” Fraser said.

Fraser was speaking at the launch of the Melbourne Globalist, a magazine focused on international affairs that is based jointly at the universities of Melbourne, Monash, RMIT and La Trobe.

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

Is Wall Street at last being called to some sort of account?


Last Monday night, ABC's 4 Corners aired a PBS Frontline program from the USA, The Untouchables. The topic was based on the fact that no senior executives from Wall Street had ever seen the inside of a court, let alone a prison, for bringing the USA and the world to their collective knees through the Global Financial Crisis.  Read about the Australian experience here.

On reading this CorpWatch account of more Wall Street goings-on, one wonders if the financial whales are getting closer to facing some meaningful penalties for their seemingly never-ending romance with derivatives.



Wall Street Giants – JP Morgan and SAC – Hauled Up On Fraud Allegations
by Pratap ChatterjeeCorpWatch Blog
March 15th, 2013

2010 protest against JP Morgan. Photo: SEIU. Used under Creative Commons license
JP Morgan - the Wall Street investment bank - and SAC - a major hedge fund - were hauled up Friday for alleged fraud. JP Morgan was questioned at a U.S. Senate hearing about hiding trading losses while SAC agreed to pay $614 million to settle insider trading charges.

The Wall Street bank attracted Congressional interest because of a $6.2 billion loss that the company incurred last year when a trader named Bruno Iksil – nicknamed the London Whale because of the size of his financial bets – was outsmarted by a hedge fund. (See “Whale Wars: Hedge Funds Rob Banks, and the Poor Suffer Most” on CorpWatch) On Friday the company was forced to testify about how that happened after a damning Senate investigation showed that the company ignored its own risk rules, rewrote key documents and hid information from regulators.

Notably JP Morgan took federally-insured money and used it to construct a $157 billion portfolio of synthetic credit derivatives which they proceeded to gamble with. As the portfolio started to lose money, the panicked traders substituted mid-point valuations that looked more favorable.

Chase decided to go into the fiction business and invent a new way to value its crazy-ass derivative bets, using, among other things, a computerized model the company designed itself called "P&L predict" which subjectively calculated the value of the entire fund toward the end of every business day,” writes the always succinct Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone. “If this all sounds familiar, it's because it's the same story we've heard over and over again in the financial-scandal era, from Enron to WorldCom to Lehman Brothers – when the going gets tough, and huge companies start to lose money, they change their own accounting methodologies to hide their screw-ups, passing the buck over and over again until the mess explodes into the public's lap.”

“The (federal investigators) told the Subcommittee that if the Synthetic Credit Portfolio were an airplane, then the risk metrics were the flight instruments,” wrote the Senate investigators. “In the first quarter of 2012, those flight instruments began flashing red and sounding alarms, but rather than change course, JPMorgan Chase personnel disregarded, discounted, or questioned the accuracy of the instruments instead.”

There is clear evidence that the federal authorities failed in their oversight duties of these risks, according to the Senate. While JP Morgan misled the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) by not reporting the increase in the size of the portfolio, it did provide numbers that showed that the bank “repeatedly breached the its stress limits in the first half of 2011, triggering them eight times, on occasion for weeks at a stretch.” Yet nobody at the OCC appear to notice. (Later, in April 2012, risk limits were exceeded a remarkable 160 times!)

Somewhat surprisingly the person who comes through as clear-sighted is the London Whale himself. Iksil – according to the Senate report – repeatedly tried to warn his bosses about the problems but was ignored.

“I know that you have a problem; you want to be at peace with yourself. It’s ok, Bruno, ok, it’s alright. I know that you are in a hard position here,” Javier Martin-Artajo, one of Iksil’s bosses told him at the time.

A key witness at Friday’s hearing conducted by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs was Ina Drew, the former head of the chief investment office in charge of trading in London. "Things went terribly wrong," she said, blaming traders like Iksil, claiming that key facts "were not brought to my attention at the time.”

“Drew, however, was one of the villains in the bank's own account of what went wrong, and you could see the pressure building up in her mind as she declined to answer, paused, or claimed lack of recall,” writes Heidi Moore at the Guardian who watched the Friday hearing. “When Drew was asked if she knew one key and obvious fact – whether JP Morgan had skipped a crucial yearly check on its trading limits – she demurred that she couldn't recall.”

Not only did senior management claim that they had no memory of these problems, they did not mention the accounting changes in an internal bank investigation completed in January 2013. “I don’t believe we called that out in the report,” Michael Cavanagh, co-C.E.O. of JPMorgan’s corporate and investment bank, told the hearing.

Senators were furious. "Firing a few traders and their bosses won't be enough to staunch Wall Street's insatiable appetite for risky derivative bets or to stop the excesses,” said Carl Levin, the chair of the subcommittee. “When Wall Street plays with fire, American families get burned. The task of federal regulators, and of this Congress, is to take away the matches. The whale trades demonstrate that task is far from complete.”

Meanwhile, also in Washington DC, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that a major hedge fund had agreed to pay $614 million to settle charges of insider trading.

SAC Capital - one of the most profitable hedge funds in history with $15 billion in assets averaging 30 percent in annual profits for 20 years running – has been under investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for several years. (See “U.S. Prosecutors Build Case Against Steve Cohen, Hedge Fund Billionaire”)

Most of the settlement related to the case of Mathew Martoma of CR Intrinsic Investors (a SAC subsidiary) who approached Dr. Sidney Gilman, then a 73 year old professor at the University of Michigan, for information on a clinical trial for an Alzheimer's drug being jointly developed by two pharmaceutical companies.

At the time Gilman was chairman of a board monitoring trials of the drug. He was persuaded to sell SAC inside information ahead of time that allowed the investors to avoid $276 million in losses by selling stock as soon as they learned that the drug trials were going badly.

SAC Capital agreed to pay $600 million to settle the Martoma case, without acknowledging any responsibility. But the SEC was blunt about the reason. “The historic monetary sanctions against CR Intrinsic and its affiliates are sharp warning that the SEC will hold hedge fund advisory firms and their funds accountable when employees break the law to benefit the firm,” said George Canellos, acting director of the SEC’s enforcement division.

In addition SAC also paid out $14 million to the SEC to settle charges against Sigma Capital Management for allegedly profiting from early information about the earnings of Dell and Nvidia, two technology companies.

Postscript from The Network: 
JP Morgan slashes CEO pay after losses
JP Morgan finds a nasty surprise


Further reading - JP Morgan in Australia & New Zealand

Thursday, 6 October 2011

THE OCCUPY WALL STREET MOVEMENT ... coming to somewhere in Australia near you

I am sure that even people who are not on Twitter have heard of #OccupyWallStreet and the variations of it that have sprung up across the USA and Canada. Now, comes a declaration from here.  I am sure that what is happening in the USA will, more than likely, find itself replicated in Australia in spite of economic conditions being less severe than those experienced in the USA.

People are tired -

  • of the wealthy having a dominant say and getting their way
  • of insurance companies who won't pay up when natural disaster strikes
  • of career minded politicians across all parties who are poll and business driven - not people sensitive
  • of in your face alcohol, gambling and sexual services
  • of the little losses of amenity in life eroding what was once a carefree Australian life
Please Networkers, feel free to add to the list of what you are tired of and what would get you off your behinds to protest outside a bank, a parliament, council offices, corporate establishments.  The list above is just to get you started.


Declaration of the Occupation of 

New York City

What follows is the first official, collective statement of the protesters in Zuccotti Park:

As we gather together in solidarity to express a feeling of mass injustice, we must not lose sight of what brought us together. We write so that all people who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world can know that we are your allies.

As one people, united, we acknowledge the reality: that the future of the human race requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their neighbors; that a democratic government derives its just power from the people, but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth; and that no true democracy is attainable when the process is determined by economic power. We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments. We have peaceably assembled here, as is our right, to let these facts be known.

  • They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.
  • They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.
  • They have perpetuated inequality and discrimination in the workplace based on age, the color of one's skin, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation.
  • They have poisoned the food supply through negligence, and undermined the farming system through monopolization.
  • They have profited off of the torture, confinement, and cruel treatment of countless animals, and actively hide these practices.
  • They have continuously sought to strip employees of the right to negotiate for better pay and safer working conditions.
  • They have held students hostage with tens of thousands of dollars of debt on education, which is itself a human right.
  • They have consistently outsourced labor and used that outsourcing as leverage to cut workers’ healthcare and pay.
  • They have influenced the courts to achieve the same rights as people, with none of the culpability or responsibility.
  • They have spent millions of dollars on legal teams that look for ways to get them out of contracts in regards to health insurance.
  • They have sold our privacy as a commodity.
  • They have used the military and police force to prevent freedom of the press.
  • They have deliberately declined to recall faulty products endangering lives in pursuit of profit.
  • They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.
  • They have donated large sums of money to politicians, who are responsible for regulating them.
  • They continue to block alternate forms of energy to keep us dependent on oil.
  • They continue to block generic forms of medicine that could save people’s lives or provide relief in order to protect investments that have already turned a substantial profit.
  • They have purposely covered up oil spills, accidents, faulty bookkeeping, and inactive ingredients in pursuit of profit.
  • They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media.
  • They have accepted private contracts to murder prisoners even when presented with serious doubts about their guilt.
  • They have perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.
  • They have participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.
  • They continue to create weapons of mass destruction in order to receive government contracts.*
To the people of the world, We, the New York City General Assembly occupying Wall Street in Liberty Square, urge you to assert your power.
Exercise your right to peaceably assemble; occupy public space; create a process to address the problems we face, and generate solutions accessible to everyone.
To all communities that take action and form groups in the spirit of direct democracy, we offer support, documentation, and all of the resources at our disposal.
Join us and make your voices heard!

NationofChange has been an unfiltered media resource for the Occupy Wall Street movement even while the mainstream media has ignored, censored, and undermined the progress of the people.
Rather than delivering consumers to advertisers NationofChange works tirelessly to deliver people to one another.
Make a secure, tax-deductible donation to NationofChange today, and help sustain this vital service to the community.

Sunday, 9 January 2011

#Assassination of Gabrielle Giffords : lessons to be learned

Amplify


The American congresswoman pictured above is dead.
This is a sad day for her family and for democracy in the USA.
My thoughts and sympathies go out to all concerned.
~~~~

Australia is fortunate.
No politician has been assassinated, ever.

Gabrielle Giffords is the first woman in America to be assassinated.
As my Twitter friend @hyperlocavore says, we've come a long way.

A question has been raised about whether 
the Sara Palin ad below will be buried.

Please note: Gabrielle Giffords name is there.
The Tea Party were unashamedly out to get her -
and to stop the USA getting equitable health care
similar to that of every other developed nation in the world.
Giffords particularly worked on getting better mental health care.
For all that is known at this stage, mental health or lack of it
could be the root cause of Giffords' death.

I think all politicians, political operatives, and media people everywhere
need to take note.
Excessive and violent political language
can result in excessive and violent political deeds.
When there is civil unrest and disruption arising from 
widespread inequity and injustice,
violence can raise its ugly and damaging head.

We could say - Only in America - but hatred of the heart
is not limited by geographical boundaries nor by cultural idiosyncracies.
Hatred can spring from very deep wells anywhere.

In Australia, we have people in politics and the media
who thrive on division, sectionalism, self-aggrandisement.
We have people in politics and the media
who care nothing for others, understand nothing of how others live.

We have division over water, over Coal Seam Gas mining,
over the privatisation of utilities,
and of being ripped off by such policies.
We know our government, our political parties are not listening.
Our national government hangs on a delicate thread.
The electorate has tried its best to send a message.
Politicians say they are listening - but are they?

Let's build a strong base - a just civil society.
Otherwise, there is this - the crazy, violent American way.

Postscript 7.10am
Reports coming in that Giffords is alive.

Wednesday, 29 December 2010

The Empire strikes back: USA takes China to the WTO over wind power subsidies #renewables #trade #flexingmuscles

Wind Turbines, Lake George (Weereewaa), near Bungendore NSW
September 2009
The turbines were in test mode at this time.

What can one say about the World Trade Organisation (WTO) from my lowly position in the world?  I hear news items from time to time announcing that Australia is taking a matter to the WTO or someone is trying to get their produce into the Australian market and has had to take their case to the WTO. We object because our country is clean of whatever and the other country gives room and board to some insect or disease I have never heard of.  Is our complaint just?  I don't know.  We just might be drumming up objections on behalf of our sweet-smiling agricultural folk who carry a lot of weight come election time. A bit like the case outlined below which is taken at the instigation of steelworkers in an economy in which manufacturing has been declining.

In short, the WTO probably saves us a few wars, armed conflicts and military skirmishes - which might have been the case a century or two ago.  To New York, the nations of the world take their trade disputes. International bureaucratic processes ensue and a long time later there is a response or a decision.  Well, you know what they say about conception and elephants, Networkers.

That long-winded intro is to tell you about what might be a little doozy for the WTO to decide - and innocent by-standers are left to their own conjecture on what it might be all about actually.

The Obama Administration in the USA has filed a complaint with the WTO over China's wind-power subsidies.  I learned this from my Daily Grist (see here). Based on my limited knowledge and limited ability to observe Australia's goings on at the WTO, the Grist assessment sounds reasonable.  The outline done by greentechmedia gives a good nuts and bolts description of the process. But we mustn't be one-sided about this, must we.  So over I popped to the New York Times.

The NYT highlights the involvement - or quiescence - of General Electric, a company not always known for sound environmental practice.  Further criticism of China is here in highlighting the way China is alleged to treat foreign companies in China.

I have to say though that I do find this response from an NYT reader of interest:
There is another side to this story, of course - namely, that both the Obama and Bush Administrations have focused on subsidizing the following:

1) Coal-to-gasoline plants (billions from the DOE, often cloaked as "CO2 capture projects")
2) Tar sand imports (billions in Congressional loan guarantees for new gas pipelines to feed the tar sand production system)
3) Liquefied natural gas imports (more billions to Exxon and Chevron for their Indonesian and Papua New Guinea LNG projects)
4) A new round of ridiculously expensive taxpayer-subsidized nuclear reactors ($8 billion in loan guarantees for Southern - Georgia nuclear plants).
There are many similar examples of the Obama-Bush focus on fossil fuels and nuclear - but solar and wind have received almost nothing in comparison.
Clearly, this could be challenged by China as unfair government support for fossil fuel & nuclear (which, despite the earnest claims of Energy Secretary Chu, are hardly "clean" and definitely not renewable) - but China is obviously more concerned with reducing its dependence on fossil fuel imports by moving state support away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy.
The U.S. would be wise to follow suit - but the gross imbalance between U.S. subsidies for fossil fuels & nuclear over solar, wind and sustainable biofuels (algal biofuels & artificial photosynthetic approaches) has distorted U.S. energy markets and made investors very hesitant about putting their money into renewables - a situation which pleases the fossil fuel & nuclear cartels to no end.
Hence, the U.S., on energy, is running with cartel capitalism - not with competitive free market approaches - and should itself be subject to severe WTO penalties for such blatant market manipulation.

~~~~~~~~
I suppose Networkers,
(bad pun warning!)
we shall have to wait and see which way the wind blows.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 18 December 2010

Stewart and Colbert's Rally for Sanity and or Fear : sinister forces behind it?


Back in October, I posted on the Rally for Sanity and/or Fear held in Washington DC under the sponsorship of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. I have to-day received an email from Daniel James giving another view about the Rally contained in a comment on his blog. This is an outcome of my comments on Daniel's bog.

As Networkers understand, I place a lot of faith in community - community networking, community engagement, community communicating with and listening to each other.  I am a glass half-full gal with more than my fair share of optimism and idealism.  In fact, I like to think that if disparate voices were gathered in one place as community and under the care of a very good community engagement facilitator there might be great ideas coming forth, greater than the sum of the parts, which no one present had dreamed of.

My knowledge of US politics - while above average - is from over the sea and far away.  I have no way of verifying what is in the comment Daniel has forwarded to me - but the information is presented clearly and with links.  So here is what has been drawn to my attention.  Please comment - intelligently and in the spirit of The Network.  I am not inclined to accept barely literate invective or lunatic fringe stuff.  Get the drift?

So here 'tis.
~~~~~~~~~
fromDaniel James
tomisseaglesnetwork@gmail.com
date18 December 2010 10:56
subject[Daniel James] New Comment On: The Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear - An Outsider’s View

hide details 10:56 (13 minutes ago)
There is a new comment on the post "The Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear - An Outsider’s View".
http://danieljames.com.au/?p=1021

Author: Ignia
Comment:
I just thought you would like to know....

The Rally to Restore Sanity And/Or Fear was actually started by an internet group that is known as Anonymous. You may know them by the name of Redit, /b/, 4chan, et. al. I believe the exact group that is responsible is Reddit.

They are well known for their ability to cause pain, ruin, and even financial meltdown of people they choose to target, arranging for deliveries of pizzas, furniture, in at least one instance a hearse and even coffins to the homes of those who spark their ire, or even ddos attacks and overloading of spam to take down those they deem their enemies.
Some examples:
http://www.openmediaboston.org/node/1072
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Kenny_Glenn

Their sinister slogan, and their warning, is as follows:
"We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us."

(The Oregon tea party adopted that as their slogan. Anonymous got word... and the state's political party was forced to change it within a week after Anonymous was alerted, after all of their websites, facebook, twitter, and even email accounts got hacked, spammed, and shut down. http://gawker.com/5596806/oregon-tea-party-borrows-4chans-slogan)

The Rally to Restore Sanity actually started on Reddit as The Rally to Restore Truthiness.

http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2010/09/a_colbert_rally_to_restore_tru.php
http://thedailywh.at/post/1054828465/worthwhile-cause-of-the-day-in-the-wee-hours-of

The combined forces of Anonymous donated to Donorschoose.org, a charity of which Colbert is a board member in the attempt to get his attention. Which certainly succeeded.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/trying-to-goose-truthiness-rally-colbert-fans-raise-record-breaking-charity-numbers/

In summary; the idea for the rally actually started at ground level and worked its way to the top from the American People. We demonstrated our seriousness of interest in this rally... and Colbert and Stewart responded.

Hope this information helps!

See all comments on this post here:
http://danieljames.com.au/?p=1021#comments


Enhanced by Zemanta

Total Pageviews