Showing posts with label Torture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Torture. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 January 2016

PLEASE SHARE THE NEWS ABOUT GUANTANAMO - SHUT DOWN THIS OBSCENE PLACE - THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT




World Can't Wait | January 5, 2016
IN 2002, the Bush regime set up a primitive prison camp at the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Over six years they held 776 men there without charges, using what they called “enhanced interrogation” and the rest of the world calls “torture.” Bush called these men “the worst of the worst,” though most had been turned in for $5,000 cash bounties the U.S. paid, and had no connection to attacks on the U.S. An international outcry brought about the release of more than 500 of the prisoners.

Torture is a war crime, and a crime against humanity.

International and U.S. law prohibit torture, under any and all circumstances, without exception. If we fail to hold our government and its officials accountable for the American torture state they have constructed, we are condoning that torture and it will continue to occur.
The systemic abuse witnessed at Guantanamo is sustained by a culture of impunity. High government officials responsible for wars of aggression and conspiracy to commit torture walk free, unrepentant and boldly advocating for more of the same.

Why is Guantanamo still open?

And what can we do to close it?

Evidence against some prisoners is tainted, usually because of a tortured confession. There is no legal way to get a conviction. Political calculation notwithstanding, in a free and just society, anyone detained by the government must be charged and given a fair trial, or released. And that won’t happen by the secret military tribunal system that President Obama has established to replace real justice.
The U.S. commander-in-chief has authority, independent of Congressional approval, to close the hated prison camp with the stroke of a pen. It’s up to us to make that happen.

On January 11, 2016, the U.S. torture camp at Guantanamo will have been open 14 years.

One of Obama’s first acts as president in 2008 was to order closure of Guantanamo within one year, leading most people to think the terrible practice of preemptive incarceration without trial is over. But it isn’t.
105 men are still held, 46 of whom are cleared for release. They suffer the Obama administration’s policy of indefinite detention. An unknown number of hunger strikers are being force-fed in violation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture.
The closure of Guantanamo Bay Prison Camp can’t wait. The abomination of U.S. torture must not only end; the rationale of “exceptionalism” — that American lives are worth more than others — must be repudiated.

Guantanamo: how will WE be judged?

Our government has done its best to hide the torture practiced at the experimental off-shore prison camp and forestall any attempts at accountability for the perpetrators and enablers of those crimes. But thanks to a courageous and ongoing hunger strike by prisoners, Obama was forced to condemn extrajudicial punishment.
Protestations of executive “my hands are tied” impotence are no longer plausible. It is up to us to demand closure of Guantanamo and repudiation of the lawlessness exhibited there.

When IGNORE–ance = death, silence is not an option

“The president knows that Guantanamo is wrong, legally and morally,” says Wells Dixon, senior attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, who has represented clients at Gitmo since 2005. “But the failure to ensure accountability for the sins of the prior administration is like trying to avoid treatment for mental illness with the hope that it will go away,” he says. “The more you ignore it, the more it comes back to haunt you.”
The President and Congress have responded to prisoner demands with callous disregard for basic legal and human rights. Murder by neglect... is this the end of the line? Will people living in the United States accept this version of history? Or will we step up to the task at hand and close down Guantanamo once and for all?

TORTURE + SILENCE = COMPLICITY! ACT NOW TO STOP TORTURE!

Saturday, 10 December 2011

Coming together: the military pimping of military women



It is strange how the synchronicity of what comes across one's path in close conjunction turns one's thoughts.
This week there has been a certain conjunction in:
Freeman Dyson's review of the Daniel Kahneman book, How to Dispel your illusions.
Geraldine Brooks' Third Boyer Lecture, At Home in the World.
Reports of the court martial investigating allegations a naval officer aboard an Australian warship repeatedly spanked the bare buttocks of a junior female sailor in the shadow of events in relation to sexual abuse at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA). 

Dyson's review of Kahneman's work begins with insights into military decision-making.  Military decision-making in the bureaucratic culture in which it exists is a mystery to many, not least to those within the military itself.  It is often costly of lives and resources in quite profligate ways.

Brooks' Third Boyer Lecture gives full flight to her feminism.  She tries to explain her views of women, war and feminism not least among these is consideration of  a woman's right to fight and die as as a soldier for her country. In this stream of consciousness, Brooks speaks of meeting Janis Karpinsky early in Karpinsky's career.  She speaks of  the betrayal of military women by their colleagues across cultures.

Brooks points out that Janis Karpinsky - the only senior scapegoat connected to the  torture at Abu Ghraib - was demoted and disgraced while male colleagues involved went onto develop and prosper in their military careers.

Brooks reports US servicewomen's role in the interrogation of Muslim prisoners by performing lewd behaviour.  She points out that these actions have been officially reviewed and sanctioned.  Brooks accusation is strong:
"The US military has sunk to pimping its female personnel." 

Women, Brooks sums up, should approach the military life only with "a pair of tongs and a hazmat suit".

And while we hear news of elsewhere, how are things on the Australian homefront?  Tawdry is one word for it. Demeaning is another as we hear of the spanking court-martial and actions at ADFA.

All this brings me to ask - what to do?  Women have demanded and earned the right to pursue their careers of choice. Women have demanded the right of sexual freedom, a right men have always taken as their own.  How then does a liberal society respond when women are abused, when freedom of choice is short-circuited?

My beginning suggestion is that we put away the tut-tuts or guffaws.  What we need to develop within our civil society is a policy of no tolerance for such behaviour, such decision-making.  We need to work at developing a society in which, when we hear of such behaviour, the perpetrators run the risk of becoming socially, politically, and financially outcast themselves.

There have to be such community sanctions in place that the perpetrators - no matter how high within the military, no matter the skewed view of what military situations might demand - know with certainty that they are indulging in high risk behaviour.

Human society has always functioned in this way - inclusion, exclusion; reward and sanctions.  At this time in the 21st century, many human societies across the world are displaying a clear lack of moral compass.  There is a significant inability to treat others with the respect which we would claim for ourselves.  It is being writ large in financial collapse - but this could not have occurred without widespread individual moral collapse at its core.

In Australia, the settler contingent have always carried on like a colonised people ready to imitate and adopt the actions and attitudes of its "betters" in Europe or the USA.  In the USA, we are currently looking at the religious co-option of one side of politics. Such religious co-option has widespread imitation in Australia. One thing we must remember is that religion  \ne \!\,  morality; religion does not equal morality.  Lack of religion does not automatically mean lack of morality.

Without entering into the depths of discussion about the cultural relativism of morality, I would suggest two things to bear in mind.  Firstly, that the Christian's Golden Rule of doing unto others as you would be done by is found, in one form or another, across many religions and cultures. Here is evidence of a basic way forward in human society.  Secondly, Australia has/had developed an ethos which may be fast eroding away.  We have, in white culture, developed the concepts of being fair dinkum or, in Aboriginal parlance, being a true fella, and of giving everyone a fair go or an equal chance.

Being fair dinkum, giving everyone a fair go will take us a long way to keeping the moral compass of Australian civil society firmly in place.  We need also to take heed of what our Aboriginal compatriots teach us, that without each other; without family and without culture and country we are empty shells.

Further reading:

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

The #penis as a #weapon of #war. #power #dominance

Amplify


Tess Lawrence has been in touch with me to-day.  Tess is most concerned about Iman al-Obeidi and women like her who are tortured, raped, and otherwise mistreated.  Rape is one of the oldest weapons of human warfare still in use in the 21st century CE.  It would be difficult, I would think, to find a war in which rape has not been a feature.  Rape is a unique act of aggression from an individual upon an individual.  

Tess has written a strongly constructed piece on the use of the penis as a weapon of war.  Beware: this subject matter might not be everyone's cup of tea.  Tess outlines the advantageous features of the penis as a weapon of war and the immediate and residual effects of its use..  If you read this article and agree with what Tess has written, could you lease pass this on to your own networks.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Total Pageviews