Tuesday 10 July 2012

Equal rights for equal sites: the fight of Australian workers against driven down pay rates

My friend Sue Bolton has written in GreenLeft Weekly of the industrial action being taken by workers employed by Toll Logistics at the Coles distribution centre at Somerton in Melbourne's north.  This strike highlights the two-speed labour market which supports inequities in Australian workforces.  Direct Coles employees working in this warehouse are paid at one level and Toll employees doing the same work get nowhere near the same pay and conditions.  It's very convenient for employers to play both ends against the middle to make inroads into the pay and conditions of ordinary industrial workers. 

I would ask people to consider not shopping at Coles or any other Wesfarmers business for a while until wage justice comes to the workers at Somerton.  Wesfarmers is the largest private employer in Australia across a wide range of business and corporate interests. To check on which businesses are in the Wesfarmers portfolio, please go here

~~~~~~~~

Warehouse workers take the fight up to Toll Logistics

Saturday, July 7, 2012
About 500 Toll warehouse workers at Somerton in Melbourne’s northern suburbs have voted for an indefinite strike in their campaign for a new enterprise bargaining agreement.
The warehouse is a Coles distribution centre, but Coles outsources the workers to Toll Logistics. This has resulted in workers getting up to 20% less pay than other Coles warehouse workers.
Unlike other Coles warehouse workers, the Toll employees do not get rostered days off and receive no shift loading for most of their afternoon and night shifts. Rights for casual employees and union representatives are inferior compared with other Coles warehouses.
One of the campaign slogans is for “equal rights for equal sites”. The five key claims that the workers are fighting for are:
• Rostered days off for dayshift and full shift loading for afternoon and night shifts.
• Union rights protected in the workplace agreement.
• Rights for casuals protected in the agreement.
• A payrise of 5% a year for three years.
• A voluntary public holiday system.
Toll has rejected all of the claims and has tried to stop the workers holding a ballot to vote on taking industrial action. The National Union of Workers covers the warehouse workers and has worked hard to involve all sections of workers in the campaign — permanents, casuals, day, afternoon and night shift workers.
The union says this is especially important because Toll manipulated the last enterprise bargaining campaign in 2009 when it employed a large number of casual workers for a single shift to vote in favour of a substandard agreement.
When the warehouse was built in 2006-2007, the employment practices sparked a big industrial dispute when metal construction workers resigned their casual employment and set up a 24-hour protest outside the gate.
This group of workers were forced to sign Australian Workplace Agreements with very low pay and conditions compared to the building industry norms.
As a new site, Toll used the “greenfields” component of the Howard government’s Work Choices anti-union laws to open up the warehouse with a greenfields enterprise bargaining agreement. This meant it could get away with ignoring the standards set at other Coles Myer distribution centres.
Toll Logistics is crying poor in its negotiations with the NUW, but it posted a profit of $294 million in the last financial year. Coles’s owner Wesfarmers made a profit of almost $1.2 billion in the last six months of last year.
More companies are now outsourcing their warehouse operations with a resulting cut in pay and conditions for warehouse workers. This practice is referred to as “third-party logistics proposer”.
If Toll does not make an acceptable offer to the workers by 6am on July 10, workers will begin strike action. Supporters around Melbourne are gearing up to provide support to the workers. 

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 comment:

This blog does not take Anonymous comments. Experience shows that comments cluttered with "Anonymous" are boring and people don't know whether "Anonymous" is one person or many. This is not a decision about freedom of speech. It is a decision about boring or unwillingness to be known by even a pseudonym.

Total Pageviews