Thursday 24 March 2011

Bronwyn Bishop & Sophie Mirabella co-opted to demean a woman #women #tonyabbott #bronwynbishop #sophiemirabella

Amplify

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott speaking 
at the anti-carbon tax rally in Canberra, Wednesday, March 23, 2011. 
More than 3,000 people attended the rally 
to protest against the Government's proposed carbon tax. 
(AAP: Alan Porritt)

My South African blogging friend, Steve Hayes, has been writing about the church and political and governmental 'relationships'.  I have commented on his post along the theme of 'co-option'.

I then have gone on to find the picture accompanying Annabel Crabb's post on The Drum. What the picture does not tell you is who the two women are standing beside Opposition Leader Tony Abbott.  The older woman with the blonde hair is Bronwyn Bishop. Standing between Bishop and Abbott (sorry for the clerical pun) is Sophie Mirabella.

Tony Abbott has been facing calls on commercial and ABC talk-back radio to-day for an apology to the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, for speaking under placards such as these above.  There will be no apology except in a most general, back-handed form either from Tony or from the organisers of the rally.

I have not yet heard of any call from anybody for Bishop and Mirabella to explain to us why they were co-opted under such a banner which demeaned not only the status of the office of Prime Minister but also demeaned our most senior female in government and, in my view, such a sign demeaned the status and personae of women everywhere.

The questions that need to be addressed to Bishop and Mirabella is quite simply this:

Do you support the demeaning of women and of female leadership in this way?
Would you support the demeaning of your own female leadership in this way?

Abbott has tried to wriggle out of the contretemps by saying that it is democracy, free speech, and he had/has no control over people at a rally at which he is speaking.

Senator Christine Milne put paid to this argument in an interview on Radio 774 with Waleed Aly this morning.  While she agreed with Abbott that one could not control who brought what placards/posters to a public rally, Milne maintains that one can always control one's personal space and be aware of how cameras are framing you within their picture.  Milne said that Abbott could have refused to speak until such offensive material was removed from around him.  From the photograph, it is clear that neither Bishop nor Mirabella - who are not known to be shy and retiring wallflowers - has any qualms about their own personal space and the framing of themselves within camera shots.

So, Bronwyn Bishop and Sophie Mirabella, please explain.  

Further reading:
Enhanced by Zemanta

2 comments:

  1. It is a demeaning issue.
    Political race to the bottom of the ditch. Can they beat Pauline Hansen there, I mean?
    Probably not.
    Denis

    ReplyDelete
  2. Clearly, this whole episode is an all-or-nothing effort to be relevant. I don't think it's going to work. The Sydney shock jocks managed to attract 1500 people - 3000 if you want to put the 1500 in a rosy glow. Wouldn't have thought that counted for much. 250,000 people marched across the Bridge in Sydney to get Howard to say Sorry to Aboriginal people. 100,000 people marched in Sydney to protest Australian's participation in the Iraq war. The Howard Govt completely ignored these truly significant numbers. And we are supposed to obey and cave in to the lies, hubris, slander and evil wishes of a mob of 1500 people. Alan Jones has to be joking!

    ReplyDelete

This blog does not take Anonymous comments. Experience shows that comments cluttered with "Anonymous" are boring and people don't know whether "Anonymous" is one person or many. This is not a decision about freedom of speech. It is a decision about boring or unwillingness to be known by even a pseudonym.

Total Pageviews