Monday, 11 October 2010
What's happening to Channel 10's demographics, seriously!
Sunday, 10 October 2010
Jan Beer contests seat of Seymour as an Independent: community engagement & transparency major issues
Miss Eagle supports Jan's candidacy because of the Brumby Government's poor track record on community engagement and transparency. Jan Beer's candidacy supports these basic democratic rights and procedures. The Brumby Government has no whole of government policy on professional and modern community engagement. Where, within the bureaucracy, there is a belief that community engagement is practised the record ranges from poor through to awful and, at times, absolutely disgraceful.
I am standing as a candidate in the Seymour electorate because I believe Victorians deserve a more open, accountable and transparent government. Honesty and integrity has been sadly missing whilst Premier Brumby has been in office.
I refuse to stand by and watch the erosion of our democratic rights where the basic right to peacefully protest results in people being arrested, and where individuals are spied upon by their own Government. My State has become veiled in a cloak of secrecy in which a detached Government answers every question and every criticism with spin and vindictive action.
So many major projects in Victoria have been fast-tracked with sham consultation, secrecy, refusal to disclose business cases or failure to follow mandatory business case guidelines.
Examples of these are the North-South Pipeline, Regional Rail Link, Desalination Project, Wallan-Kilmore Bypass, Black Forest Drive narrowing project, destruction of the historic Toorourrung Reservoir Spillway and, of course, the WIndsor Hotel debacle. The list of mishandled projects is almost endless.
As a Yea farmer and small business owner in Seymour with my husband Neil, I have the experience and insight to understand the needs and issues of my rural-urban electorate. This life experience, I believe, would put me in good stead to represent the Seymour Electorate.
I am also standing as an independent candidate so I do not have to toe the “party political line”and can advocate for and represent rural Victorians without fear or favour – a task, if honoured by the Seymour Electorate, I would revel in.
Jan Beer Contact Number 0407 144 777
Relevant links: Jan Beer in pipe legal fight
The 7.30 Report – ABC – Victoria’s north-south pipeline under scrutiny
The Age – Pipeline critic spied on, tailed
Written and authorised by Jan Beer, 486 Limestone Rd., Yea 3717
Related articles
- Pipeline protester announces candidancy (news.theage.com.au)
- Oppn pledges Kilmore-Wallan bypass (news.theage.com.au)
- Desal plant a $570m-a-year drain (theage.com.au)
- Desal to cost, even if no water (heraldsun.com.au)
- Massive cost for desal plant revealed (news.theage.com.au)
- Voters out of loop in ALP's Victoria: a state of secrecy (theage.com.au)
- Farmers want pipeline shut off (news.theage.com.au)
River, Lakes & Coorong Action asks: Can we afford not to act?
The River, Lakes and Coorong Action Group Inc (RLCAG) welcomes the release by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) of the much-anticipated Guide to the draft Basin Plan (8 October 2010).
‘There has been a great deal of speculation regarding the content,’ says Professor Diane Bell, Chair of the RLCAG, ‘and we are delighted that the MDBA acknowledges a healthy river system is in the national interest.
‘It is our position that pitting economic interests against those of the environment is not in the national interest. It is only by restoring the river to health and setting the sustainable diversion limits with due consideration to our variable climate that we will be able to enjoy all that the Murray-Darling Basin offers us in terms of economic, cultural, spiritual, ecological values.
‘The MDBA Plan process is a unique opportunity for Australia to become a world leader in wise water use and stewardship of a major river system.
- We have had good rains.
- The country is beginning to recover.
- We have good modelling of what is needed to maintain a healthy system.
- We have seen the consequences of mismanagement.
- We know we are an ingenious, creative nation and many of our farmers have already retooled for the changed conditions.
‘Until now it has been the river that has borne the brunt of our unwillingness to acknowledge that the River is not the Magic Pudding.
‘Now we need to see proper planning and that will come from a whole of government response that demonstrates commitment to the objects of the Water Act 2007.
Do we have the courage, vision and knowledge to act? Can we afford not to act?’
Related articles
- Old pals reunite as the Murray meets the sea (theage.com.au)
- SA welcomes Water Plan guide (news.theage.com.au)
Saturday, 9 October 2010
Water Warriors out to play on the Murray Darling Basin Plan
Murray-Darling Basin Plan must not become a political football
8th October 2010
National public water rights and environmental advocacy group Fair Water Use is encouraged by the broad recommendations made in the guide to the draft Basin Plan released earlier today by the Murray Darling Basin Authority, but is concerned that Federal and State parliamentarians will use the forthcoming consultation period to justify softening of the Plan for short term electoral advantage, rather than to promote the long term interests of the river system and its communities.
The group’s national coordinator, Ian Douglas, commented this afternoon, “The progressive degradation of the Murray-Darling cannot be resolved without significant impact upon those who were previously encouraged by successive governments to overexploit the waters of the nation’s most vital rivers.”
Fair Water Use believes that Australian governments must shoulder much of the blame for the crisis, as a result of a raft of inept policies, including the hyper-allocation of Murray-Darling water, the COAG decision of 1994 to develop a national “water industry” and the promotion of agribusiness-based managed investment schemes.
“Basin communities have themselves been exploited by Federal and State administrations and the pro-market lobby and have every right to feel aggrieved”, Dr Douglas added.
A politically fudged and compromised Basin Plan will be no friend to those who seek to make responsible use of Murray-Darling water. The Murray-Darling Basin Authority must be allowed to develop its Basin Plan free from pressure from those who fail to grasp, or choose to ignore, the profound, long term, economic, social and environmental implications of a degraded Murray-Darling river system.
“Governments must now devise concerted regional development initiatives, to enable Basin communities to transition to a sustainable future”, Dr Douglas concluded.
Related articles
- Council welcomes Murray-Darling plan (news.theage.com.au)
- Factbox: Key facts about Australia's Murray-Darling basin (reuters.com)
- Murray-Darling set for minimum water return (theage.com.au)
- Plan best chance to save Murray: Greens (news.theage.com.au)
View of the Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan…from the Redgum Campaign Front
knocked this up in the airport - a quick look at what the Guide says and what's wrong with it. Unfortunately ACF have already given qualified support for the 4000GL target but other greenies are sort-of holding the line. Will put it in an ebulletin on Sunday but thought you'd appreciate an earlier reportback.
Cheers,
jono
~~~
How much water do we need for a healthy Basin?
The Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has released its much awaited Guide to the Basin Plan, a draft proposal for the restoring the Murray-Darling Basin to ecological balance. According to the Guide we must return 7,600 billion litres of water to the rivers, lakes and wetlands of the Basin if we want a healthy environment.
Irrigation lobbyists the National Irrigators Council and National Farmers Federation attacked the Guide but shied away from offering an alternative proposal.
The MDBA have been tasked with coming up with a Basin Plan that sets a sustainable limit on how much water can be extracted from Basin rivers, and lays out a plan for returning water to our parched rivers and wetlands. The Plan will be finalised by the end of next year, with water being restored to the environment from 2014.
In the Guide we have the first glimpse of the MDBA’s thinking on how much water is needed and where. Environmentalists, Traditional Owners and farming communities have been awaiting this moment and none left today’s briefing with everything they wanted.
Despite determining that another 7,600 billion litres is what the environment really needs, the MDBA immediately dismissed this as coming with too higher cost to farming communities. Instead, a range of 3,000 to 4,000 has been considered, despite the fact that this does not guarantee that environmental outcomes will be delivered.
For example, if 4,000 billion litres per year were restored we would lose up to 25% of our remaining red gum forests. Given that over 80% of them have already been cleared, we cannot afford to lose a quarter of what’s left.
There are many other areas for improvement in the Guide, including:
- Dealing with the impact of mines on groundwater – whilst the Guide acknowledges that mining – particularly coal seam gas extraction in the Northern Basin - is seriously impacting groundwater reserves, this is yet to be quantified or catered for in sustainable water extraction limits
- Recognising cultural flows - no attempt has been made to deal with Indigenous water rights or assess the cultural and environmental water needs of Traditional Owners.
- Accounting for how logging reduces water runoff – despite recognising that plantations have a significant impact on water yields, the Guide makes no mention of the widely documented impact of native forest logging on catchment runoff.
- Managing environmental water for the environment – the Guide asserts that 19,100 billion litres is currently provided to the Basin environment. What it doesn’t say is that a huge proportion of this is not managed for an environmental benefit, but just to keep the irrigation system running. For example, in NSW almost all recognised environmental water (some 9,000 billion litres state-wide) is simply what is lost to evaporation or left over after irrigation entitlements are delivered.
- In somewhat Orwellian terms, this is called “planned environmental water,” yet little or no attempt is made to ensure it is released at a time or location that will actually benefit the environment. Because the rivers are run for the benefit of irrigation, this 'environmental water' is often delivered at the wrong time of year or the wrong location to actually benefit native species. The same situation exists across the border in Victoria, where only 6% of ‘environmental water’ is managed explicitly for environmental outcomes.
The [Barmah Campaign] Collective will be analysing the Guide in preparation for making a detailed submission early next year when the Draft Basin Plan is released, however the MDBA have already opened a preliminary submission period and we encourage you to have your say.
Jonathan La Nauze
Red Gum Campaign Coordinator
Friends of the Earth Melbourne
PO Box 222
Fitzroy Vic 3065
Ph: +61 3 9419 8700 - Extension 21
Fax: +61 3 9416 2081
Mob: +61 402 904 251
www.melbourne.foe.org.au/?q=bmc/news
Friday, 8 October 2010
The Murray-Darling Basin Plan is out and on-line
Currently, on ABC TV and on ABC News 24 the Press Conference releasing the plan is being held.
To get the low-down on the hoe-down which is the Murray-Darling Basin Plan a new website has been established. For all things to do with the Plan, please go here.
- Biggest water cuts expected in the Murrumbidge Irrigation Area and the Goulburn-Broken Rivers area
- Miss Eagle has been saying that this is the biggest structural adjustment since white settlement. The MDBA say that this sort of organisation of a massive river basin has never been done ANYWHERE IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. This is a world first, Australia! Imagine!
- Barnaby Joyce has spoken at a Press Conference yet could not comment on The Guide's detail. He is now speaking again just to give free kicks to Penny Wong. I would remind Networkers that John Howard tasked former National Party Leader John Anderson with the task of sorting out the mess that has been the over-allocation of water in the Murray-Darling Basin. Anderson spent about two years on this and couldn't sort it. Agricultural politics is an agressive, self-interested and nasty business! The Nats don't deserve any air time to complain. Let them learn to be constructive, instead of destructive. Get on with doing a proper job, Barnaby.
Interview with John Anderson , 25 August 2003
Irrigators unhappy with groundwater program
Cubbie Station in South Queensland, Australia's major interstate water diversion issue
The Great Water Plan by John Quiggin
Farmers' water reform fears
Basin plan trade-off would cut 800 jobs
Basin plan presents once-in-a-lifetime opportunity

Make yourself a stakeholder in the stakeholder engagement strategy for the Murray Darling Basin Plan development process
Our stakeholders are groups or individuals who have an interest in the development and implementation of the Basin Plan and the activities of MDBA.
In preparing the stakeholder engagement strategy, we identified over 1000 stakeholder groups who can be broadly grouped as follows:
- · people living in the Basin and the broader Australian community
- · industry, conservation, recreation and community groups
- · local governments
- · Indigenous peoples
- · Basin Community Committee
- · Basin Officials Committee
- · state government agencies and departments — scientific, technical and policy
- · Commonwealth Government agencies and departments — scientific, technical and policy
- science and research communities
(download document in box above)
Murray Darling cuts 'could spark riots
Irrigators warn water cuts will devastate communities

It's almost here...what we have been waiting for... the Guide to the Proposed Murray-Darling Basin Plan
Related articles
- The Murray-Darling plan explained (abc.net.au)
- Old pals reunite as the Murray meets the sea (theage.com.au)
- Murray-Darling plan may cost extra $2bn (theage.com.au)
- Farmers face cuts to save Murray (theage.com.au)
- Push for all-round support on Murray-Darling action (theage.com.au)
- Bligh anxious about basin plan (news.theage.com.au)
- Celebrations muted despite 'singing land.' (theaustralian.com.au)
- Farmers consider walking off land (news.theage.com.au)
- Farmers accept water cuts needed: Burke (news.theage.com.au)
- Burke considers Murray-Darling towns (news.theage.com.au)
Wednesday, 6 October 2010
Spicks & Specks–the bits they left out

The picture above is from here.
I have been a Spicks and Specks fan since Night One. That surely shows what excellent taste Miss Eagle has.
To-night, the edition has been a bit different – literally, out of order. We have been shown all the edited-out bits. I have been helped along by a friend turning up with some Pepsi to which I added some Bundy left over from Sunday’s Rugby League Grand Final! I have to say in what a wonderful frame of mind the Bundy & Peps and the naughty bits left me.
Adam Hills, and the anchors Myf Warhurst and Alan Brough, are, IMHO, absolutely brilliant. They have tickelled my funny bone for years now and continue to do so. To-night they sent me into hysterics, a coughing fit, and perhaps an unredeemable apopleptic health event. The ruling triumvirate are brilliant – and their guests….
Perhaps my favouritest guest is Denise Scott, a woman of similar. if imprecise, vintage. She is impossible! In the nicest possible way, mind you. Although I am in love with Hamish Blake.
This set me to thinking. I think Spicks has moved up a notch. There is now room for the Grown-Up Edition (GUE) which MUST include the impromptu left out bits. Impromptu is more fun, don’t you think?
Jobs with justice for Aboriginal workers : Day of Action & Protest - 29 October 2010
The Intervention Rollback Action Group in Alice Springs is requesting support for a statement demanding 'Jobs with Justice for Aboriginal Workers' that will be launched on October 29 with protest rallies around the country.
The statement highlights the serious breaches of workers' rights and massive increases in unemployment that have taken place under the NT Intervention. We are aiming to print it in The Australian newspaper on the day of the launch. The cost of the public notice is expected to be around $11,000.
The closure of Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) has been devastating, throwing proud community workers who were being paid wages onto the dole.
Recent revelations of widespread starvation in Aboriginal communities provided to an NT government child protection inquiry underscore the complete failure of the NT Intervention to address acute social problems.
Unless the resources currently being spent on discriminatory bureaucracy can be redirected to employment opportunities and programs based in Aboriginal communities, the well-being and living conditions of Aboriginal people in the NT will continue to sharply deteriorate. Please follow the links provided in the footnotes to the attached statement, or get in contact if you require any more information about these issues.
Pressure is mounting for change. As highlighted in this statement, the UN Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has recently issued another strong condemnation of NT Intervention. And in the
recent federal election, strong Greens candidates Barbara Shaw and Warren H Williams out-polled both Labor and Liberal in Aboriginal communities in Central Australia standing on a clear anti-Intervention platform.
The call for support for the 'Jobs with Justice' statement came from a major conference held in Alice Springs in July. Aboriginal community leaders, human rights activists and union members and representatives from across the NT and Australia all pledged support. Other early endorsements include the Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union (LHMU) NT who cover many Aboriginal workers affected by the Intervention and Aboriginal leaders such as Barbara Shaw and Larissa Behrendt.
This letter is requesting:-
- Your public endorsement of the 'Jobs with Justice' statement;
- A donation to help with the cost of publication. All donations are most appreciated no matter how small. If you or your organisation would like to be listed as a supporter in the newspaper, we are requesting donations of $100 or more.
- Help securing the endorsement of this statement by potentially supportive organisations
in solidarity,
Paddy Gibson
for the Intervention Rollback Action Group Alice Springs
-----------------------------
The NT Intervention promised to deliver ‘real jobs’ for Aboriginal communities. Instead, thousands of waged jobs have been lost and Aboriginal organisations have been crippled as Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) close down. [i]
Under the new CDEP scheme designed by the Federal Labor government, Aboriginal people no longer receive wages. They are being forced to work providing vital services such as rubbish collection, school bus runs, sewerage maintenance, construction and aged care in exchange for quarantined Centrelink payments.[ii]
People are compelled to work 16 hours a week for $115 cash, plus $115 credit on a ‘BasicsCard’ which can only be used on ‘priority items’ in government approved stores. Aboriginal workers have described this as a return to the "ration days", when they were paid in food instead of cash.
Centrelink is threatening to cut off payments entirely if people do not participate. Unclear guidelines and the vulnerable position of many workers have seen cases of people working 30 hrs or more for no extra money.[iii]
The Labor government committed to halving the gap in employment outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in a decade. But due to a continuation of Howard era policies such as the Intervention, Indigenous unemployment has drastically worsened from 13.8% in 2007 to 18.1% in 2009.[iv]
500 ‘real jobs’ created to replace some of the lost CDEP positions in remote NT shire councils face the axe next year. The Commonwealth is refusing to guarantee ongoing funding of $8.5 million per year needed by the NT government to keep the jobs.[v]
The NT Intervention shames Australia. Despite recent amendments, the United Nations Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) ruled in August that Intervention legislation provides clear evidence of "embedded racism" against Aboriginal people.[vi]
Rather than abandon failed policy, the government is planning to spend $350 million (over 4 years) to expand income management across the NT.[viii]
The government must act immediately to:
- Guarantee the 500 threatened Shire jobs
- End compulsory income management
- End current CDEP arrangements forcing people to work for the BasicsCard
- Turn all CDEP positions into fully waged jobs
- Provide massive investment in job creation and service provision inall Aboriginal communities.
______________________________
[i] There were approximately 7500 CDEP participants receiving wages in
the NT before reforms that came with the Intervention. See Altman, J
‘Neo-Paternalism and the Destruction of CDEP’, Arena 90, September
2007 at http://www.
[ii] See Gibson, P Working for the BasicsCard in the Northern
Territory, Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning UTS Briefing Papers
at http://www.jumbunna.uts.
[iii] The Age June 16 2010
http://www.theage.com.au/
[iv] Crikey June 4 2010
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/
[v] ABC http://www.abc.net.au/
http://search.abc.net.au/
[vi] ABC http://www.abc.net.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/
[vii] A full copy of the UNCERD report is available at
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/
[viii] ABC http://www.abc.net.
















