Monday, 11 October 2010

What's happening to Channel 10's demographics, seriously!


What is going on, Networkers?  For years we have known quite clearly the demographics of Channel Ten.  They have clearly directed their programming to the twentysomething and thirty somethings....


Of course there is that slogan...Seriously Ten.  Does this mean that programming at Ten might not have been so light-hearted and Gens Y and X less frivolous than we have believed.  

Does seriously now mean that there has to be notable gravitas in reading the news at Ten...hence the appointment of the baby-boomer pin-up boy, George Negus.  Although George, like Miss Eagle, precedes the Baby Boomer generation.  I would call us members of the Scarce Generation - those babies born while a large proportion of Aussie men were overseas fighting in World War II.  In fact, George was born within a month of the Fall of Singapore.  Miss Eagle was born twelve days before D-Day.

So what is going on when George leaves SBS and Dateline for News at Six at Ten Next Year?  And who is on the shortlist for Dateline or a revamped version thereof?

Perhaps George is showing his age in more ways than one.  It is likely that he just wants to turn up for work and read the stuff that someone else has put together.  Perhaps, having got tired of traipsing around the world with Sixty Minutes, George is now tired of travelling Australia and the same-old same-old current affairs format.  Perhaps, now that George is eighteen months away from his three-score-and-ten, it is time to cosy up for a little news-reading to round off an illustrious career.  

At least this career change means that he is not on the short-list for Kerry O'Brien's anchor job on The 7.30 Report.  I think it is time for a female front for that program and that the job should go to a well-qualified but recently unemployed person living in the Federal seat of Bennelong.  

So it looks like G is for George as well as Gravitas - but what about the demographics.  The ABC is thought to have the over 60s market sewn up pretty well - well, it had me sewn up in every decade of my whole life even before television!  And I am still there except for little sojourns to crime and Kevin McCloud on Foxtel. So if the over 60s do a big shift to watch Ten News read by George will it impact on the ABC News slot at 7pm?  So much change.....
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 10 October 2010

Jan Beer contests seat of Seymour as an Independent: community engagement & transparency major issues


Jan on the campaign frontline at Glenburn last year.

Jan Beer has given a lot of time to water activism in the last couple of years.  She has been one of the leaders in the Plug the Pipe campaign to stop a pipeline taking water from the drought-stricken Goulburn River catchment to Melbourne.  Now she is taking the water battle to a new frontline – the Victorian State Election to be held on 24 November 2010.


Miss Eagle supports Jan's candidacy because of the Brumby Government's poor track record on community engagement and transparency.  Jan Beer's candidacy supports these basic democratic rights and procedures.  The Brumby Government has no whole of government policy on professional and modern community engagement.  Where, within the bureaucracy, there is a belief that community engagement is practised the record ranges from poor through to awful and, at times, absolutely disgraceful.
~~~
  


I am standing as a candidate in the Seymour electorate because I believe Victorians deserve a more open, accountable and transparent government.  Honesty and integrity has been sadly missing whilst Premier Brumby has been in office.


I refuse to stand by and watch the erosion of our democratic rights where the basic right to peacefully protest results in people being arrested, and where individuals are spied upon by their own Government.  My State has become veiled in a cloak of secrecy in which a detached Government answers every question and every criticism with spin and vindictive action.

So many major projects in Victoria have been fast-tracked with sham consultation, secrecy, refusal to disclose business cases or failure to follow mandatory business case guidelines. 

Examples of these are the North-South Pipeline, Regional Rail Link, Desalination Project, Wallan-Kilmore Bypass, Black Forest Drive narrowing project, destruction of the historic Toorourrung Reservoir Spillway and, of course, the WIndsor Hotel debacle.  The list of mishandled projects is almost endless.

As a Yea farmer and small business owner in Seymour with my husband Neil, I have the experience and insight to understand the needs and issues of my rural-urban electorate.  This life experience, I believe, would put me in good stead to represent the Seymour Electorate.
  
I am also standing as an independent candidate so I do not have to toe the “party political line”and can advocate for and represent rural Victorians without fear or favour – a task, if honoured by the Seymour Electorate, I would revel in. 

Jan Beer Contact Number   0407 144 777
Relevant links:   Jan Beer in pipe legal fight
                        The 7.30 Report – ABC – Victoria’s north-south pipeline under scrutiny
                         The Age – Pipeline critic spied on, tailed
Written and authorised by Jan Beer, 486 Limestone Rd., Yea 3717
Further reading:
Enhanced by Zemanta

River, Lakes & Coorong Action asks: Can we afford not to act?

clip_image002
Media Release: Can we afford not to act? 8 October 2010

The River, Lakes and Coorong Action Group Inc (RLCAG) welcomes the release by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) of the much-anticipated Guide to the draft Basin Plan (8 October 2010).
‘There has been a great deal of speculation regarding the content,’ says Professor Diane Bell, Chair of the RLCAG, ‘and we are delighted that the MDBA acknowledges a healthy river system is in the national interest.

‘It is our position that pitting economic interests against those of the environment is not in the national interest. It is only by restoring the river to health and setting the sustainable diversion limits with due consideration to our variable climate that we will be able to enjoy all that the Murray-Darling Basin offers us in terms of economic, cultural, spiritual, ecological values.

‘The MDBA Plan process is a unique opportunity for Australia to become a world leader in wise water use and stewardship of a major river system.
  • We have had good rains.
  • The country is beginning to recover.
  • We have good modelling of what is needed to maintain a healthy system.
  • We have seen the consequences of mismanagement.
  • We know we are an ingenious, creative nation and many of our farmers have already retooled for the changed conditions.
‘But, we cannot ask those whose lives and communities will be fundamentally transformed by reduced allocations and buy backs to cope alone. We cannot and should not leave it to the market to establish the conditions under which their lives will now be lived.

‘Until now it has been the river that has borne the brunt of our unwillingness to acknowledge that the River is not the Magic Pudding.

‘Now we need to see proper planning and that will come from a whole of government response that demonstrates commitment to the objects of the Water Act 2007.

Do we have the courage, vision and knowledge to act? Can we afford not to act?’

Diane Bell, 
Chair, RLCAG
0427 554 194
 
Keep our waters alive!
ABN 23 590 559 324
PO BOX 307, Strathalbyn, SA 5255
Mobile: 0427 554 194
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 9 October 2010

Water Warriors out to play on the Murray Darling Basin Plan

Miss Eagle's comrade-in-arms on water issues, Diane Bell, 
Professor Emerita of Anthropology at the George Washington University in Washington, D. C.
was pictured in The Age yesterday together with this article. 

Diane is a hard worker on water and this year has been particularly strenuous
as she battled to get water high on the priority list in the South Australian state election.

Networkers, if you have been taking a back seat on what is happening to water,
please step up to the plate.
You will find energetic and knowledgable colleagues doing battle across the nation.
Together we form a highly active network.
Please express your interest and commitment by emailing
misseaglesnetwork(at)gmail(dot)com

Murray-Darling Basin Plan must not become a political football

fair water use
MEDIA RELEASE
8th October 2010

National public water rights and environmental advocacy group Fair Water Use is encouraged by the broad recommendations made in the guide to the draft Basin Plan released earlier today by the Murray Darling Basin Authority, but is concerned that Federal and State parliamentarians will use the forthcoming consultation period to justify softening of the Plan for short term electoral advantage, rather than to promote the long term interests of the river system and its communities.

The group’s national coordinator, Ian Douglas, commented this afternoon, “The progressive degradation of the Murray-Darling cannot be resolved without significant impact upon those who were previously encouraged by successive governments to overexploit the waters of the nation’s most vital rivers.”

Fair Water Use believes that Australian governments must shoulder much of the blame for the crisis, as a result of a raft of inept policies, including the hyper-allocation of Murray-Darling water, the COAG decision of 1994 to develop a national “water industry” and the promotion of agribusiness-based managed investment schemes.

“Basin communities have themselves been exploited by Federal and State administrations and the pro-market lobby and have every right to feel aggrieved”, Dr Douglas added.

A politically fudged and compromised Basin Plan will be no friend to those who seek to make responsible use of Murray-Darling water. The Murray-Darling Basin Authority must be allowed to develop its Basin Plan free from pressure from those who fail to grasp, or choose to ignore, the profound, long term, economic, social and environmental implications of a degraded Murray-Darling river system.

“Governments must now devise concerted regional development initiatives, to enable Basin communities to transition to a sustainable future”, Dr Douglas concluded.

Related reading from Miss Eagle's files
Ian Douglas mentions above the 1994 decision by COAG
For more information - 
which is vital to an understanding of the current state of play -
please read the following:

Enhanced by Zemanta

View of the Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan…from the Redgum Campaign Front

Hi folks,
knocked this up in the airport - a quick look at what the Guide says and what's wrong with it. Unfortunately ACF have already given qualified support for the 4000GL target but other greenies are sort-of holding the line. Will put it in an ebulletin on Sunday but thought you'd appreciate an earlier reportback.
Cheers,
jono
~~~
How much water do we need for a healthy Basin?
The Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has released its much awaited Guide to the Basin Plan, a draft proposal for the restoring the Murray-Darling Basin to ecological balance. According to the Guide we must return 7,600 billion litres of water to the rivers, lakes and wetlands of the Basin if we want a healthy environment.

Irrigation lobbyists the National Irrigators Council and National Farmers Federation attacked the Guide but shied away from offering an alternative proposal.

The MDBA have been tasked with coming up with a Basin Plan that sets a sustainable limit on how much water can be extracted from Basin rivers, and lays out a plan for returning water to our parched rivers and wetlands. The Plan will be finalised by the end of next year, with water being restored to the environment from 2014.

In the Guide we have the first glimpse of the MDBA’s thinking on how much water is needed and where. Environmentalists, Traditional Owners and farming communities have been awaiting this moment and none left today’s briefing with everything they wanted.

Despite determining that another 7,600 billion litres is what the environment really needs, the MDBA immediately dismissed this as coming with too higher cost to farming communities. Instead, a range of 3,000 to 4,000 has been considered, despite the fact that this does not guarantee that environmental outcomes will be delivered.

For example, if 4,000 billion litres per year were restored we would lose up to 25% of our remaining red gum forests. Given that over 80% of them have already been cleared, we cannot afford to lose a quarter of what’s left.

There are many other areas for improvement in the Guide, including:
  • Dealing with the impact of mines on groundwater – whilst the Guide acknowledges that mining – particularly coal seam gas extraction in the Northern Basin  - is seriously impacting groundwater reserves, this is yet to be quantified or catered for in sustainable water extraction limits
  •  Recognising cultural flows - no attempt has been made to deal with Indigenous water rights or assess the cultural and environmental water needs of Traditional Owners.
  • Accounting for how logging reduces water runoff – despite recognising that plantations have a significant impact on water yields, the Guide makes no mention of the widely documented impact of native forest logging on catchment runoff.
  • Managing environmental water for the environment – the Guide asserts that 19,100 billion litres is currently provided to the Basin environment. What it doesn’t say is that a huge proportion of this is not managed for an environmental benefit, but just to keep the irrigation system running. For example, in NSW almost all recognised environmental water (some 9,000 billion litres state-wide) is simply what is lost to evaporation or left over after irrigation entitlements are delivered.
  • In somewhat Orwellian terms, this is called “planned environmental water,” yet little or no attempt is made to ensure it is released at a time or location that will actually benefit the environment. Because the rivers are run for the benefit of irrigation, this 'environmental water' is often delivered at the wrong time of year or the wrong location to actually benefit native species. The same situation exists across the border in Victoria, where only 6% of ‘environmental water’ is managed explicitly for environmental outcomes.
The Guide is only a first step in developing the Basin Plan, and despite its flaws, some good progress has been made. We now have a basin-wide target to discuss and analyse, and it is now clearer than ever that significant cuts to water extraction are urgently needed.

The [Barmah Campaign] Collective will be analysing the Guide in preparation for making a detailed submission early next year when the Draft Basin Plan is released, however the MDBA have already opened a preliminary submission period and we encourage you to have your say.

Jonathan La Nauze
Red Gum Campaign Coordinator
Friends of the Earth Melbourne
PO Box 222
Fitzroy Vic 3065
Ph:  +61 3 9419 8700 - Extension 21
Fax: +61 3 9416 2081
Mob: +61 402 904 251
www.melbourne.foe.org.au/?q=bmc/news
foea-thumbnail
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 8 October 2010

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan is out and on-line

map-large
Click to enlarge

Currently, on ABC TV and on ABC News 24 the Press Conference releasing the plan is being held.
To get the low-down on the hoe-down which is the Murray-Darling Basin Plan a new website has been established.  For all things to do with the Plan, please go here.

Please be in touch with this, Networkers.  
I want to know what you reckon.
  • Biggest water cuts expected in the Murrumbidge Irrigation Area and the Goulburn-Broken Rivers area
  • Miss Eagle has been saying that this is the biggest structural adjustment since white settlement.  The MDBA say that this sort of organisation of a massive river basin has never been done ANYWHERE IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD.  This is a world first, Australia! Imagine!
  • Barnaby Joyce has spoken at a Press Conference yet could not comment on The Guide's detail. He is now speaking again just to give free kicks to Penny Wong.  I would remind Networkers that John Howard tasked former National Party Leader John Anderson with the task of sorting out the mess that has been the over-allocation of water in the Murray-Darling Basin.  Anderson spent about two years on this and couldn't sort it.  Agricultural politics is an agressive, self-interested and nasty business!  The Nats don't deserve any air time to complain.  Let them learn to be constructive, instead of destructive.  Get on with doing a proper job, Barnaby.

Further reading:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Make yourself a stakeholder in the stakeholder engagement strategy for the Murray Darling Basin Plan development process

 
River-junction---060821_580x435
is being released this afternoon.
Are you a Stakeholder?
You may not consider yourself a stakeholder,
but you can be if you want to be.
Please go to this page to read all about the
of the
The stakeholder list is extensive
Here is a list (but not the whole list) of the people the MDBA considers part of their stakeholder engagement process:
Our stakeholders are groups or individuals who have an interest in the development and implementation of the Basin Plan and the activities of MDBA.
In preparing the stakeholder engagement strategy, we identified over 1000 stakeholder groups who can be broadly grouped as follows:
  • · people living in the Basin and the broader Australian community
  • · industry, conservation, recreation and community groups
  • · local governments
  • · Indigenous peoples
  • · Basin Community Committee
  • · Basin Officials Committee
  • · state government agencies and departments — scientific, technical and policy
  • · Commonwealth Government agencies and departments — scientific, technical and policy
  • science and research communities

So, you can see Networkers, it is all up to you.  You can include yourself through sheer interest – and interest can be wide or specific.


This is the biggest structural adjustment in Australia since white settlers first arrived and we began to fight the First Nations for control of their land.  We are about to see farmers and people living in rural and regional Australia put up a fight for control of their livelihoods, their communities, and what they consider as their land and their water.

This structural adjustment will be so widespread in breadth and depth that few of us will be left unaffected … right down to food availability, food security, food pricing and food quality.  So you may not be a grower.  You may not live in a rural or regional town or city.  But sure as God made little green apples you are a consumer!

So there is the involvement of your very own individual self-interest.  But let us all, Networkers, reach beyond that to listen to the people in the Murray-Darling Basin who are most affected by any future decisions.  We may not always agree with them.  We might find their priorities are not our priorities.  However, we owe these people our greatest attention and respect in what they about to go through.  For so many of them will find themselves in the Valley of Decision.  That is not a pretty place to be…and some will suffer from the strain.


Further reading:
Regional communities  can build resilient futures with less water
(download document in box above)
Murray Darling  cuts 'could spark riots
Irrigators warn water cuts will devastate communities
Enhanced by Zemanta

It's almost here...what we have been waiting for... the Guide to the Proposed Murray-Darling Basin Plan

The Junction of the Murrray and the Darling
at Wentworth, NSW. August, 2006.

In Miss Eagle's ever so humble opinion,  the Guide to the Proposed Murray-Darling Basin Plan, will usher in the biggest structural adjustment in Australia's history since white settlement.  I have said it before and I will keep on saying it...until I'm proved wrong.

Already farmers and irrigators have been sizing up their future on the land and many have already departed.  The For Sale signs have been up for quite a while across the Murray-Darling Basin and inland communities have lost businesses and population.  I expect that the MDB Plan will herald a whole new attitude to water.  

For a start, irrigators have tended to exhibit a sense of ownership over water in their areas as they seek to have first dibs on it for productive purposes.  Australians haven't argued about this...until recent years when The Big Dry and a growing knowledge of how we have mucked up this wonderful country have led us to consider different ways of doing things.

Over here, Sarah Clarke has laid out the central features of the MDB Plan.  This will be a good place to start, Networkers, as you come to grips about what it all means.

Sarah points out that the Federal Government hopes to achieve a balance between agricultural, industrial, human and environmental needs.  This is the current thinking of governments, environmental organisations and so-called Greenies these days.  How that balance is established and managed is the crucial thing, though.  And in establishing this balance, as those who have worked on the Victoria Water Act know, there are different views and different interests and we don't all get our wish-list.

The first thing to remember is that since 1994, Australia has been part of the landscape of commodified water.  So many of us still believe - in spite of weak-kneed governments and greedy and zealous water traders - that water is a common good and a human right.  When commodification and capital (in other words, money) enter the debate, the terms of that debate are well and truly modified away from that which most of us once knew to be true and another step is laid on the road to scarcity (although more a perceptive step than a real one).  

In Australia, The Big Dry has clearly demonstrated that we can never go back to a business-as-usual approach and, if we ever do so, we will pay a heavy price.  The Universe has spoken loudly and clearly.  We have been wrong, thoughtless and selfish in our management, use, and exploitation of the natural environment.  We have destroyed or come close to destroying that on which our life depends.  

None of us can own the water in spite of what Water Registers may say.  We may think that piece of trading paper denotes something of value...but water has a way of slipping through one's fingers and going its own way to destruction or life. 

In April this year, I travelled to Kerang  to attend a Community Information Session with the relevant bureaucrats working with the MDB Plan.  It was quite an instructive exercise.  The Bureaucratic Travelling Road Show is on the road again across the Basin in the wake of the Plan's release.  For a list of dates, places and venues please go here.  

If you are a townie, Networkers, with a sympathy for the bush and our precious Australian environment, I recommend that you get yourself to a session somewhere in the Basin at your convenience.  It is good to get a handle on and a feel for what affected people are thinking and saying at first hand - and not mediated through the urban media.  It is good to be able to try to nail the bureaucratic thinking and assess how they are dealing - well or otherwise - with us, the wider community.  

As you will see from the list, the sessions are not necessarily occurring in the same places as last time.  I went to Kerang last time but it is not on the list this time.  I will give consideration to attending the Echuca-Moama session and, at the same time, having my first look at the Murray since The Big Wet.  Shepparton might also be a place to go.  Large numbers are expected there it would seem because two sessions are scheduled.

So let's see what the Plan is all about.  If we think it gets things wrong, we will need to say so loud and clear.  If it gets thing right, we need to express this just as clearly.  There have been many attempts to sort out the Murray-Darling Mess.  Let's get a Murray-Darling Plan that works and sorts out the problems and the difficulties.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 6 October 2010

Spicks & Specks–the bits they left out

 

Team captains Myf Warhust (left) and Alan Brough, with Spicks and Specks host Adam Hill

The picture above is from here.

I have been a Spicks and Specks fan since Night One.  That surely shows what excellent taste Miss Eagle has. 

To-night, the edition has been a bit different – literally, out of order.  We have been shown all the edited-out bits.  I have been helped along by a friend turning up with some Pepsi to which I added some Bundy left over from Sunday’s Rugby League Grand Final!  I have to say in what a wonderful frame of mind the Bundy & Peps and the naughty bits left me.

Adam Hills, and the anchors Myf Warhurst and Alan Brough, are, IMHO, absolutely brilliant. They have tickelled my funny bone for years now and continue to do so.  To-night they sent me into hysterics, a coughing fit, and perhaps an unredeemable apopleptic health event.  The ruling triumvirate are brilliant – and their guests….

Perhaps my favouritest guest is Denise Scott, a woman of similar. if imprecise,  vintage.  She is impossible! In the nicest possible way, mind you. Although I am in love with Hamish Blake. 

This set me to thinking.  I think Spicks has moved up a notch.  There is now room for the Grown-Up Edition (GUE) which MUST include the impromptu left out bits.  Impromptu is more fun, don’t you think?

Stop the NT Intervention - Jobs with Justice - Alice Springs 12.30pm 29 October 2010

Jobs with justice for Aboriginal workers : Day of Action & Protest - 29 October 2010

NETWORKERS,
Please mark your calendars now.
Protests and actions will be taking place in
Sydney, Melbourne, and Alice Springs.
This I can say for sure.
Please notify me at misseaglesnetwork(at)gmail(dot)com
of other actions.
If nothing is planned where you live,
please get going now and make this protest truly nation-wide.
And let Miss Eagle know.

Paddy Gibson has been in touch with the following letter and statement
Paddy Gibson is a researcher at the Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning, 
University of Technology, Sydney.  He is currently working in Central Australia

Dear all,

The Intervention Rollback Action Group in Alice Springs is requesting support for a statement demanding 'Jobs with Justice for Aboriginal Workers'  that will be launched on October 29 with protest rallies around the country.

The statement highlights the serious breaches of workers' rights and massive increases in unemployment that have taken place under the NT Intervention. We are aiming to print it in The Australian newspaper on the day of the launch. The cost of the public notice is expected to be around $11,000.

The closure of Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) has been devastating, throwing proud community workers who were being paid wages onto the dole. 

It has been one of the main tools used by government to push through their current agenda of 'mainstreaming' and assimilation. Without access to proper employment programs in their own communities, the pressure builds up on Aboriginal families to move away. Similarly, without access to the funding and workers previously provided by CDEP, many Aboriginal organisations are suffering drastically reduced capacity.

Recent revelations of widespread starvation in Aboriginal communities provided to an NT government child protection inquiry underscore the complete failure of the NT Intervention to address acute social problems.

Unless the resources currently being spent on discriminatory bureaucracy can be redirected to employment opportunities and programs based in Aboriginal communities, the well-being and living conditions of Aboriginal people in the NT will continue to sharply deteriorate. Please follow the links provided in the footnotes to the attached statement, or get in contact if you require any more information about these issues.

Pressure is mounting for change. As highlighted in this statement, the UN Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has recently issued another strong condemnation of NT Intervention. And in the
recent federal election, strong Greens candidates Barbara Shaw and Warren H Williams out-polled both Labor and Liberal in Aboriginal communities in Central Australia standing on a clear anti-Intervention platform.

The call for support for the 'Jobs with Justice' statement came from a major conference held in Alice Springs in July. Aboriginal community leaders, human rights activists and union members and representatives from across the NT and Australia all pledged support. Other early endorsements include the Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union (LHMU) NT who cover many Aboriginal workers affected by the Intervention and Aboriginal leaders such as Barbara Shaw and Larissa Behrendt.

This letter is requesting:-
  • Your public endorsement of the 'Jobs with Justice' statement;
  • A donation to help with the cost of publication. All donations are most appreciated no matter how small. If you or your organisation would like to be listed as a supporter in the newspaper, we are requesting donations of $100 or more.
  • Help securing the endorsement of this statement by potentially supportive organisations
Please email your endorsement to jobs.w.justice@gmail.com or phone Marlene Hodder from the Intervention Rollback Action Group (Alice Springs) on 08 89525032.

Please forward your donation to:
Intervention Rollback Action Group
PO Box 8488
Alice Springs NT 0871

Or by direct deposit to:
Bendigo Community Bank
A/c Name: Intervention Rollback Action Gr.
BSB No: 633-000
A/c No: 134 157 049

Please send a notice to jobs.w.justice@gmail.com when you have made a donation.
Many thanks for your ongoing support.

in solidarity,
Paddy Gibson
for the Intervention Rollback Action Group Alice Springs


-----------------------------

Statement to be launched with protest rallies on October 29:
Stop the NT Intervention - Jobs with Justice for Aboriginal Workers
Worse than Workchoices

The NT Intervention promised to deliver ‘real jobs’ for Aboriginal communities. Instead, thousands of waged jobs have been lost and Aboriginal organisations have been crippled as Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) close down. [i]

Under the new CDEP scheme designed by the Federal Labor government, Aboriginal people no longer receive wages.  They are being forced to work providing vital services such as rubbish collection, school bus runs, sewerage maintenance, construction and aged care in exchange for quarantined Centrelink payments.[ii]

People are compelled to work 16 hours a week for $115 cash, plus $115 credit on a ‘BasicsCard’ which can only be used on ‘priority items’ in government approved stores. Aboriginal workers have described this as a return to the "ration days", when they were paid in food instead of cash.

Centrelink is threatening to cut off payments entirely if people do not participate. Unclear guidelines and the vulnerable position of many workers have seen cases of people working 30 hrs or more for no extra money.[iii]

This is far worse than anything the Liberals inflicted on workers under WorkChoices.

The Labor government committed to halving the gap in employment outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in a decade. But due to a continuation of Howard era policies such as the Intervention, Indigenous unemployment has drastically worsened from 13.8% in 2007 to 18.1% in 2009.[iv]

500 ‘real jobs’ created to replace some of the lost CDEP positions in remote NT shire councils face the axe next year. The Commonwealth is refusing to guarantee ongoing funding of $8.5 million per year needed by the NT government to keep the jobs.[v]  

Many Aboriginal communities serviced by these shires already suffer atrocious living conditions – 500 more job losses will be devastating.

The NT Intervention shames Australia. Despite recent amendments, the United Nations Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) ruled in August that Intervention legislation provides clear evidence of "embedded racism" against Aboriginal people.[vi] 

The UNCERD report said living conditions had deteriorated for Aboriginal people under the Intervention through loss of land, property, employment, legal rights and opportunities for cultural development.[vii]

Rather than abandon failed policy, the government is planning to spend $350 million (over 4 years) to expand income management across the NT.[viii]  

This money is desperately needed to create real jobs in Aboriginal communities and ensure the provision of basic services.

The government must act immediately to:
  • Guarantee the 500 threatened Shire jobs
  • End compulsory income management
  • End current CDEP arrangements forcing people to work for the BasicsCard
  • Turn all CDEP positions into fully waged jobs
  • Provide massive investment in job creation and service provision inall Aboriginal communities.

________________________________

[i] There were approximately 7500 CDEP participants receiving wages in
the NT before reforms that came with the Intervention. See Altman, J
‘Neo-Paternalism and the Destruction of CDEP’, Arena 90, September
2007 at http://www.federalintervention.info/docs/issues/Altman_Paternalism.pdf

[ii] See Gibson, P Working for the BasicsCard in the Northern
Territory, Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning UTS Briefing Papers
at http://www.jumbunna.uts.edu.au/publications/pdf/JIHLBP12.pdf

[iii] The Age June 16 2010
http://www.theage.com.au/national/for-some-workers-the-struggle-will-never-end-20100615-yd9p.html

[iv] Crikey June 4 2010
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/04/closing-the-gap-rudd-overpromised-on-indigenous-unemployment/

[v] ABC http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/04/2918143.htm and
http://search.abc.net.au/search/click.cgi?url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/18/2931143.htm&rank=3&collection=abcall

[vi] ABC http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2010/s2996077.htm and
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/08/17/2985720.htm

[vii] A full copy of the UNCERD report is available at
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cerd/docs/co/CERD-C-AUS-CO-15_17.doc

[viii] ABC http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/22/2933374.htm

Enhanced by Zemanta

Total Pageviews