The USA and Australia - prioritising or excluding Syrian refugees ... or could we just select for need and urgency?

Thanks to Advocacy @ St Paul's for this post.

Here in Australia we have some who want to priotise Christians.

There are those who say that Christians should not be prioritised.

Can't we just say that we will prioritise according to 

need and urgency?

And here is a comment upon the irrationality of the American decision:

Something Christian Millennials “Don’t get”

I should probably be working on one of my three term papers right now, but something is on my mind. Also, this one is just for the Christians. If you’re not a Christian, go ahead and read it, but it’s not really directed at you.

As I am writing this, 17 state governors have declared that they will not accept any Syrian refugees. I’ve seen a lot of praise over this, largely coming from Christians.

I understand the fear. Really, I do. It is, I admit, quite plausible, as we have seen from Paris, that ISIS operatives can and will sneak in with the hundreds of thousands of people fleeing from certain death or worse. However, there is a holocaust going on, and speaking for myself and I am sure many others, we cannot understand the coldness toward refugees coming from other Christians. If you will please stick with me for a few paragraphs, I will explain why we just don’t “get it.”

I was raised in a small-town Baptist church. I was taken there Sunday morning, Sunday night and Wednesday nights. I don’t care how much you like to goof off, if you spend that much time in a church, you’re going to pick up on major themes whether you want to or not.

One of those major themes is that we should be courageous. Another is that we should love our neighbors as ourselves. Another is that life is eternal.

These themes are all over the Bible. “Be strong and courageous,” God told Joshua. “Perhaps you are here for such a time as this,” Esther’s uncle said. “Do not fear those who can kill the body,” Jesus said. Jesus also told a story that would be, on the danger scale, the equivalent of a Native American carrying a bloodied and beaten white man into an Old West town saloon for help in the pioneer days. (The Good Samaritan)

And the stories didn’t just include Bible stories. Just about every evangelical (especially Baptists) know and praise the Jim Elliots of the world and their wives. If you don’t know, Jim Elliot was a missionary to somewhere in the Amazon. He and several others were killed by the natives. Later, their wives evangelized the same people who killed their husbands!

We were taught to admire people like that. The idea that nothing, and I mean absolutely NOTHING in this world is more important than expanding the Kingdom of God — not even my own life — has been drilled into me since I was a small child. And, you know what? I believe it’s the truth still!

Am I not supposed to actually believe all that stuff?  I find myself today witnessing some Christians who seem to want to be as not like Jim Elliot as possible. I do not understand this. This is what I do not “get.”

For years and years and years it has been nearly impossible to get missionaries (even sneakily) into parts of the Middle East. It’s so dangerous, some, assuming they can even get in, are likely to be killed so quickly they can’t do much evangelizing. And now, hundreds of thousands of beaten, hurting, orphaned, widowed (google “pure and undefiled religion") and broken people are trying to come to US.

Is it possible that a small percentage of them want to kill us? — Let me counter that question with another question:

Does it matter? 

Maybe it’s because I grew up in a post Columbine, post 9/11 world that we youngsters think this way, but refugees or no refugees, some folk are getting murdered in the United States today. Refugees or no refugees, there will be another school shooting somewhere. Refugees or no refugees, terrorists will find a way. Life is terminal. You WILL die.

I find it astonishing that many people want America to be recognized as a Christian nation. God forbid!

“Dear Syrian refugees,

We, the Christian nation of America, do not want you. There are some bad eggs mixed in with y’all. We’ve seen the photo of the little boy who washed up on shore. We’ve heard from Christine Caine and the A21 people who talk about how desperate the situation is. But we also have some news sources that told us that it’s all men and the women and children aren’t even there! Whew! You almost had us fooled! Have a nice life in that land of opportunity you just floated to, the bankrupt and socially troubled country of Greece. We’ll send some food over for a while. Please, steer clear of the human traffickers and report all suspicious activity to the police.

God Bless.”

Maybe I’m just wound up. I suppose it’s possible to be too wound up or emotionally stirred at something like this. But if you want to curb my youthful enthusiasm, here’s all you need to do:

Open up a Bible and make a convincing argument that Jesus wants us all to be safe more than he wants us to reach the lost and help the hurting. I was taught, after all, that Jesus trumps all — even those teaching me that Jesus trumps all. Am I supposed to believe that or not?

It’s not like I’m declaring all of us must quit our jobs and go. But not only will we not go, we don’t even want them to come to us? I am genuinely confused. Somebody help me out here.

Seven Christian activists explained their protest in Geelong ... and were fined

Cross posted from Advocacy @ St Paul's

Further to a previous post about Christian activists going to court in Geelong, there is a report of the outcome in court:

Picture above from here
Read more about it here

The Roll of Honour at Geelong:
Simon Moyle
Isabel Greenall
Jan Morgan
Craig Farrell
Brent Lyons-Lee
Erika Brunner
Tara Watts

Christian Civil Disobedience in Geelong comes to court to-day

CROSS POSTED FROM
Advocacy @ St Paul's

Praying for #LoveMakesAWay protesters in court this morning in Geelong. It doesn't have to be this way... cc @ASRC1
— Irith Williams (@IrithWilliams) December 10, 2014

 

Picture taken from The Age - originally from Facebook

Background reading here

A possible plan: Dehumanisation, stigmatisation and then the gas ovens? A possible plan: a document similar to the Barmen Declaration?

Where is this saga going to end? 

With refugees being put in gas ovens? 

Picture from here

And, if anyone thinks this comment is extreme, I ask - 

Do you not consider the response of 

Tony Abbott & his government extreme? 

Hitler didn't go immediately to his gas oven policy on coming to power in 1933. First he did what Abbott & Co are doing. Hitler made the Jews disreputable, dehumanised, non-citizens. Just like Abbott & Morrison and all those who support them and stand by them are doing to those who seek asylum and refuge in Australia. 

In 1934, in response to Hitler (and remember that at this stage there were those of power and influence in Britain who thought Hitler was great), some Christians got together and wrote the Barmen Declaration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barmen_Declaration 

The declaration is printed below.  

These German Christians got it right. 

Is it about time Christians in Australia got together 

and did something similar?

Abbott sacks asylum seeker health advisers

www.theage.com.au

The Abbott government has disbanded a key group that provided advice on the health of asylum seekers in detention, as research reveals psychiatric problems - such as self-harm - are the most common reasons for the large number of detainee visits to hospital emergency departments.

See also:

The importance of the Barmen Theological Declration

Synod of Barmen

Barth and Bonheoffer and Barmen

Karl Barth on the Barmen Synod
Karl Barth on the Confessing Church
Emergency Covenant of Pastors

Theological Declaration of Barmen

Written by Karl Barth and the confessing church in Nazi Germany 

in response to Hitler's national church.

 Its central doctrines concern the sin of idolatry and the lordship of Christ

I. An Appeal to the Evangelical Congregations and Christians in Germany

8.01 The Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church met in Barmen, May 29-31, 1934. Here representatives from all the German Confessional Churches met with one accord in a confession of the one Lord of the one, holy, apostolic Church. In fidelity to their Confession of Faith, members of Lutheran, Reformed, and United Churches sought a common message for the need and temptation of the Church in our day. With gratitude to God they are convinced that they have been given a common word to utter. It was not their intention to found a new Church or to form a union. For nothing was farther from their minds than the abolition of the confessional status of our Churches. Their intention was, rather, to withstand in faith and unanimity the destruction of the Confession of Faith, and thus of the Evangelical Church in Germany. In opposition to attempts to establish the unity of the German Evangelical Church by means of false doctrine, by the use of force and insincere practices, the Confessional Synod insists that the unity of the Evangelical Churches in Germany can come only from the Word of God in faith through the Holy Spirit. Thus alone is the Church renewed.

8.02 Therefore the Confessional Synod calls upon the congregations to range themselves behind it in prayer, and steadfastly to gather around those pastors and teachers who are loyal to the Confessions.

8.03 Be not deceived by loose talk, as if we meant to oppose the unity of the German nation! Do not listen to the seducers who pervert our intentions, as if we wanted to break up the unity of the German Evangelical Church or to forsake the Confessions of the Fathers!

8.04 Try the spirits whether they are of God! Prove also the words of the Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church to see whether they agree with Holy Scripture and with the Confessions of the Fathers. If you find that we are speaking contrary to Scripture, then do not listen to us! But if you find that we are taking our stand upon Scripture, then let no fear or temptation keep you from treading with us the path of faith and obedience to the Word of God, in order that God's people be of one mind upon earth and that we in faith experience what he himself has said: "I will never leave you, nor forsake you." Therefore, "Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom."

---

II. Theological Declaration Concerning the Present Situation of the German Evangelical Church

8.05 According to the opening words of its constitution of July 11, 1933, the German Evangelical Church is a federation of Confessional Churches that grew out of the Reformation and that enjoy equal rights. The theological basis for the unification of these Churches is laid down in Article 1 and Article 2(1) of the constitution of the German Evangelical Church that was recognized by the Reich Government on July 14, 1933:

• Article 1. The inviolable foundation of the German Evangelical Church is the gospel of Jesus Christ as it is attested for us in Holy Scripture and brought to light again in the Confessions of the Reformation. The full powers that the Church needs for its mission are hereby determined and limited.
• Article 2 (1). The German Evangelical Church is divided into member Churches Landeskirchen).

8.06 We, the representatives of Lutheran, Reformed, and United Churches, of free synods, Church assemblies, and parish organizations united in the Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church, declare that we stand together on the ground of the German Evangelical Church as a federation of German Confessional Churches. We are bound together by the confession of the one Lord of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.

8.07 We publicly declare before all evangelical Churches in Germany that what they hold in common in this Confession is grievously imperilled, and with it the unity of the German Evangelical Church. It is threatened by the teaching methods and actions of the ruling Church party of the "German Christians" and of the Church administration carried on by them. These have become more and more apparent during the first year of the existence of the German Evangelical Church. This threat consists in the fact that the theological basis, in which the German Evangelical Church is united, has been continually and systematically thwarted and rendered ineffective by alien principles, on the part of the leaders and spokesmen of the "German Christians" as well as on the part of the Church administration. When these principles are held to be valid, then, according to all the Confessions in force among us, the Church ceases to be the Church and th German Evangelical Church, as a federation of Confessional Churches, becomes intrinsically impossible.

8.08 As members of Lutheran, Reformed, and United Churches we may and must speak with one voice in this matter today. Precisely because we want to be and to remain faithful to our various Confessions, we may not keep silent, since we believe that we have been given a common message to utter in a time of common need and temptation. We commend to God what this may mean for the intrrelations of the Confessional Churches.

8.09 In view of the errors of the "German Christians" of the present Reich Church government which are devastating the Church and also therefore breaking up the unity of the German Evangelical Church, we confess the following evangelical truths:

8.10 - 1. "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me." (John 14.6). "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door, but climbs in by another way, that man is a thief and a robber. . . . I am the door; if anyone enters by me, he will be saved." (John 10:1, 9.)

8.11 Jesus Christ, as he is attested for us in Holy Scripture, is the one Word of God which we have to hear and which we have to trust and obey in life and in death. 

8.12 We reiect the false doctrine, as though the church could and would have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and besides this one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God's revelation.

8.13 - 2. "Christ Jesus, whom God has made our wisdom, our righteousness and sanctification and redemption." (1 Cor. 1:30.)

8.14 As Jesus Christ is God's assurance of the forgiveness of all our sins, so, in the same way and with the same seriousness he is also God's mighty claim upon our whole life. Through him befalls us a joyful deliverance from the godless fetters of this world for a free, grateful service to his creatures. 

8.15 We reject the false doctrine, as though there were areas of our life in which we would not belong to Jesus Christ, but to other lords--areas in which we would not need justification and sanctification through him.

8.16 - 3. "Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body [is] joined and knit together." (Eph. 4:15,16.)

8.17 The Christian Church is the congregation of the brethren in which Jesus Christ acts presently as the Lord in Word and sacrament through the Holy Spirit. As the Church of pardoned sinners, it has to testify in the midst of a sinful world, with its faith as with its obedience, with its message as with its order, that it is solely his property, and that it lives and wants to live solely from his comfort and from his direction in the expectation of his appearance.

8.18 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church were permitted to abandon the form of its message and order to its own pleasure or to changes in prevailing ideological and political convictions.

8.19 - 4. "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men excercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great among you must be your srvant." (Matt. 20:25,26.)

8.20 The various offices in the Church do not establish a dominion of some over the others; on the contrary, they are for the exercise of the ministry entrusted to and enjoined upon the whole congregation.

8.21 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church, apart from this ministry, could and were permitted to give itself, or allow to be given to it, special leaders vested with ruling powers.

8.22 - 5. "Fear God. Honor the emperor." (1 Peter 2:17.)
Scripture tells us that, in the as yet unredeemed world in which the Church also exists, the State has by divine appointment the task of providing for justice and peace. [It fulfills this task] by means of the threat and exercise of force, according to the measure of human judgment and human ability. The Church acknowledges the benefit of this divine appointment in gratitude and reverence before him. It calls to mind the Kingdom of God, God's commandment and righteousness, and thereby the responsibility both of rulers and of the ruled. It trusts and obeys the power of the Word by which God upholds all things.

8.23 We reject the false doctrine, as though the State, over and beyond its special commision, should and could become the single and totalitarian order of human life, thus fulfilling the Church's vocation as well.

8.24 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church, over and beyond its special commission, should and could appropriate the characteristics, the tasks, and the dignity of the State, thus itself becoming an organ of the State.

8.25 - 6. "Lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age." (Matt. 28:20.) "The word of God is not fettered." (2 Tim. 2:9.)

8.26 The Church's commission, upon which its freedom is founded, consists in delivering the message of the free grace of God to all people in Christ's stead, and therefore in the ministry of his own Word and work through sermon and sacrament.

8.27 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church in human arrogance could place the Word and work of the Lord in the service of any arbitrarily chosen desires, purposes, and plans.

8.28 The Confessional Synod of the German Evangelical Church declares that it sees in the acknowledgment of these truths and in the rejection of these errors the indispensable theological basis of the German Evangelical Church as a federation of Confessional Churches. It invites all who are able to accept its declaration to be mindful of these theological principles in their decisions in Church politics. It entreats all whom it concerns to return to the unity of faith, love, and hope.

---

From: The Church's Confession Under Hitler by Arthur C. Cochrane. 
Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1962, pp. 237-242.

Australian Federal Election 2013 - 1 : Are the bad old days of the police state of Queensland being relived and rechannelled through Christian micro-parties?

The above text is part of a Facebook conversation
in which Miss Eagle has been involved.

I had noted myself, in just three seats - Ballarat, Bendigo and Murray - the large number of candidates and, in particular, the rush to electoral greatness/madness of so-called "Christian" parties.

Democracy is a wonderful thing. Elections should be open to all comers. However one does have to question what is occurring. In the Ballarat seat, where there are ten candidates, three are from "Christian" parties. There are no independents.

Why is this? The $1,000 deposit to nominate? People think the Parliamentary Secretary, Cathering King, is a shoe-in?

I just wonder if there is any helping hand for the "Christian" parties from the LibNats so that their preferences can be carefully guided?  In fact, this conservative support which undoubtedly will benefit the LibNats preferrentially, reminds me of the bad old days in the police state of Queensland under Joh Bjelke-Petersen.  In some seats, the Queensland National Party used to run two candidates so it could prevent any inadvertent preference leakage.  Not only was the state gerry-mandered, the whole voting process was manipulated.

As for "a dose of the Santamarias", I think it is more likely a dose of the Tea Party and the GOP.  It's a darn pity these people don't focus more carefully on the good news of Jesus rather than their own self-image, self-promotion, and self-righteousness.

Speak out, so the haters will know their hate is wrong

“The time is over for you to be bowed down. 

The time is over for you to let the voices of oppression dominate the microphone. 

The time is over for you to be silent.

 

The time is over for you to wonder if the God of justice is still alive.”

 

-- Rev. Dr. William Barber, II, Aug 10, 2013, Wild Goose 2013

Cronulla comes to Canberra - bigotry and racism and xenophia brought to you by Abbott, Rudd, and Morrison

Picture above from here

This article was posted on Facebook to-day 

by my old friend John O'Dempsey.

John, unlike me, has remained a Labor loyalist

in spite of Rudd's latest immigration policy. 

An illuminating article on Scott Morrison - 

Australia's Shadow Minister for Immigration -

was written by Nick Bryant in The Monthly

Scott Morrison's electorate covers the scene of the Cronulla riots.

Scott Morrison claims to be a Christian

and attends Shirelive Church.

www.shirelive.com

Scott Morrison stands in complete contrast

to the previous Member for Cook, Bruce Baird.

Bruce Baird is a Christian and it is discernible.

Bruce Baird, when in Parliament, was one of a

small number of Liberal Members of Parliament

who went against the tide of the Liberal Party

on immigration and asylum seeker matters.

The last of this small number leaves the Australian Parliament

at the conclusion of this parliamentary term. 

Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, is a professing Christian

The Australian Labor Party has always had practising Christians

in parliament despite what vilifying conservate Christians may say.

Rudd is rather different insofaras he has been prepared

to wear his Christian adherence on his sleeve.

In his first Prime Ministerial term,

Rudd could be seen regularly on television

holding Press Conferences outside church on Sunday mornings.

Rudd, now in his second go as PM, does not appear to have 

re-instated this practice although it may yet occur.

He has spent a few week-ends away from Canberra.

Networkers, your Miss Eagle is a Christian too -

a practising one in two denominations, Anglican and Quaker.

I'm a rather simple soul and don't find much commonality

with either Scott Morrison or Kevin Rudd, in either faith or politics.

I don't consider myself doctrinaire

but rather a follower of the words of Jesus.

Jesus gave us two commandments -

we don't need ten if we follow the two thoroughly -

Love God with every part of our being

Love our neighbours (who are all inclusive) as ourselves.

These words are not hard to remember -

just not easy to do.

He also said this and you can reference it here:

 Beware of false prophets, 

who come to you in sheep’s clothing, 

but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 

You will know them by their fruits. 

Do men gather grapes from thornbushes 

or figs from thistles? 

Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, 

but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 

A good tree cannot bear bad fruit,

 nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 

 Every tree that does not bear good fruit 

is cut down

 and thrown into the fire. 

Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

Turning trespassers into terrorists : US gun politics : Australia's gun politics

Picture above from Common Dreams

According to the US Government, 

these three peaceful trespassers are violent criminals.

Picture from Transform Now Plowshares

Don't know how other Australians feel, but I think the United States of America has made itself a laughing stock because of its inability to legislate, through its national government, meaningful gun reform. 

The National Rifle Association has brought its nation into disrepute.

Hear Wayne LaPierre here.

Read about Wayne LaPierre here.

Vile dogma of the NRA is being spread by Amazon.com

with publication of the slogan that

"the only thing that can stop a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun".

How can the United States of America be or become a nation of peace,

with values such as this?

Peace, real meaningful and lasting peace, 

does not come from the barrel of a gun.

It comes from the heart - 

from believing in doing unto others

only that which you would have done to yourself.

If the NRA believes in gunning down human beings,

do they wish themselves and their families to be gunned down too?

To read about the Australian situation

and gun politics (yes, Oz too has gun politics)

please go here for a starter.

Then move on to reading about

the Shooters & Fishers Party.

This tiny party is highly influential in Australia's largest state, NSW.

It holds a balance of power in NSW's Legislative Council,

and the conservative Liberal National Party Government

is beholden to them -

as was the Australian Labor Party before it.

Because of this, the NSW Government is allowing hunting in National Parks.

Read about it from a rootin' tootin' shootin' huntin' point of view here.

Bryan Law has gone from our midst. The Peace Movement mourns his passing.

Lifelong social justice anti-war activist Bryan Law, passes away Australian Anti-war and social justice advocate, veteran activist Bryan Law, has died in Rockhampton. He was 58. Bryan Law, who had recently moved from Cairns to Rockhampton awaiting trial for damage to a military helicopter, passed away after a long illness. He was born in 1954. 'War without end, not in our name' He was a determined activist to the very end. In the Cairns political landscape, the name Bryan Law is synonymous with speaking out and stirring the pot. Almost every Cairns resident is familiar with his actions and activism. The Cairns Post infamously called him a serial pest, from a cub journo who had run out of adjectives. Serial he may be, but I prefer to label Bryan a veteran activist.

The above photo and text are from

Michael Moore's CairnsBlog.net

Please go to Michael's site to read more.

Sympathies of The Network are extended to

Margaret Pestorius and Joseph.

Let us work to put 

the energy and planning and resources into peace

that are put into war.

A confusion of Kingdoms

This article was posted by 

my friend Diana Haywood Rankine on Facebook. 

The relationship of NGOs (well, some of them) and church-run charities to government has bothered me for quite a while. Particularly concerning is the relationship of the latter. My thinking on this topic has been kicked off by my long-simmering anger in regard to the Rudd and Gillard Governments continuation of two dreadful policies of the Howard era: government funding of wealthy private schools such as Geelong Grammar and The Kings School and The Intervention (to me it will always be The Intervention no matter how much the Labor Govt speaks of Closing the Gap and Stronger Futures). 

I was once on the board of a major church charity and I have reflected on this as well. The article below highlights the amount of money paid to CEOs of major charities. I recall an uproar in the media some years ago about the amount of money an incoming CEO at The Brotherhood of Saint Laurence (I have no connection current or previous with this charity) was to receive. I can't recall the exact figure but let's just say HUGE, particularly in contrast to The Brotherhood's clientele. There was a lot of back-pedalling and revising on that issue. But just to give you a look at the intertwining of of government funding and apparently Christian charities operating within government guidelines please go here and study what is written. 

http://www.stlaurence.org.au/about/history.aspx 

Some of the programs are obviously government connected. Others, if you stop to think about it, almost certainly receive government funding. So while it is easy to criticise on the school funding issue because of Australia's history and politics in regard to sectarian schooling versus public schooling, we don't often think of the government linkages in relation to charitable work. 

There is a difficulty in discussing the charitable work with youth, the aged, the ill etc. This is work has always - well, almost always - been part of the Christian tradition. Rulers in Christian countries have long delivered beneficence to such charitable work. What Christians seem to have a bit of trouble with is Jesus's words about His Kingdom not being of this world. With denominational charities "brand names" supported in the public view by government funding is this a confusion of Kingdoms? Let's have a look at this confusion.

In the Kennett years in Victoria, the confidentiality clause entered into contracts connected with government funding to charities. Policy workers within charity found that they could not criticise government policy and continue to receive money from the government. On the other side of the coin, church charitable empires have frequently expanded their boundaries with government funding. They may find a need and seek funding. They may establish their work in a particular way so that they are able to get a share of existing government funding. 

The relationship between church and state is mutually beneficial. The state can make policy decisions and fund church charities to carry out the work on the ground. The state can be seen to be responsive to community needs in taking up policies and ideas from church run charities. And back again to the empire - the more money the charity receives the more offices, staff, services it can run and a corporate empire has sprung into being before you can say "social services".

Then there is the management of these services. If they are very large they tend to be bureaucratic as corporations and governments and bureaucracies are. Their modus operandi is a fit - one for the other. This is becoming more so now that these charities are seeking corporate dollars as well as public money. So another empire becomes involved in the confusion of Kingdoms. 

Long ago we learned how horrible some of the "worthy" church run charities are - the British WorkHouse idea is usually the first to spring to mind. To-day, we are trying to eliminate bushfires across the world caused by "Christian Charity". 

All these musings are very well, but there are still people in our society who need assistance for all sorts of reasons. The money to do this well needs to come from somewhere. The church/government/corporation, in all likelihood, has to continue. However, can we, as a community, together with those who work on the funding side begin to critique what is actually happening and what sort of models of assistance we are creating?

We know that the corporatisation of government has meant some horrible attitudes to need. Under the Gillard Government we may be seeing an uplift in attitudes to assistance as we see the possibility of how we might help, in a more constructive way, people with disabilities. After all, just because governments have lurched to the right does not mean that communities have forgotten their values. As a practising Christian, I ask are we really as conscious as we should be of the revolutionary and subversive message of Jesus of Nazareth? Do we know the boundaries of the empires and kingdoms? Do we understand why it is that He helped people and we try to continue in His tradition? Because if we don't understand these questions and their answers, we are nothing but money-grubbing do-gooders. We then fail to be the salt of the earth. 

Then comes Jesus's rhetorical question - 

What happens when the salt loses its savour?

Quickly! Please join this vital vigil to mourn the Stronger Futures Laws

Prayer Vigil Today to Mourn Stronger Futures Laws                  

Thursday, 19 July 2012

Rev. Rronang Garrawurra

The entire 265 Members of the Uniting Church’s Assembly meeting will hold a prayer vigil at 1 pm on Thursday 19 July on the steps of the South Australian Parliament to express their extreme concern at the passage of the Federal Government’s Stronger Futures legislation.

Assembly today decided to incorporate the vigil into the Order of Business of its triennial meeting to make the strongest possible statement about the new laws.

Chairperson of the Uniting Aboriginal and Islander Christian Congress Rev. Rronang Garrawurra and the new President of the Uniting Church Rev. Prof. Andrew Dutney will stand shoulder to shoulder at the prayer vigil.

“They have taken our land and now our humanity is taken away by this new law,” said Rev. Garrawurra, speaking through an interpreter in his native Yolngu language.

“The Uniting Church mourns another lost opportunity for true reconciliation with the First Peoples of Australia,” said Rev. Prof. Dutney who assumed the presidency of the Uniting Church last Sunday.    “The passage of Stronger Futures legislation without adequate consultation with Indigenous Australians is a lamentable development.”