Friday, 20 September 2013

The long arm of justice reaches out to Ponce from Pinochet to the present and perhaps to prison in Chile




Privatization Profiteers from Pinochet’s Chile May Yet Face Prison
by Pratap Chatterjee, CorpWatch Blog
September 19th, 2013



Julio Ponce, the billionaire owner of Sociedad Quimica & Minera de Chile (SQM), faces ten years in prison for insider trading. A beneficiary of former dictator General Augusto Pinochet, Ponce is charged with buying company shares at below market prices and selling them at a profit.

SQM – often referred to as Soquimich - is one of the world’s biggest producers of potassium nitrate, iodine and lithium which it produces with raw materials sourced from its caliche ore and brine mines in the Atacama desert. Originally a state enterprise, SQM was privatized by Pinochet in 1988 at the bargain basement price of $120 million on the advice of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The man in charge of privatization in Chile was Ponce, who trained as a forestry engineer, but had the good fortune of marrying Veronica Pinochet, the daughter of the president. Pinochet appointed Ponce to the board of SQM before it was privatized.

“Call it business savvy plus political connections on overdrive,” writes Erin Carlyle at Forbes magazine.

Ponce became president of the privatized nitrate company in 1987. Several of his relatives became major stockholders and had positions on the board of directors of the company.

Today SQM is worth $9.2 billion. Ponce has 84.1 million shares in the company, according to SQM filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) making him worth $3.3 billion.

"It is obvious that Ponce Lerou's family ties and public posts helped him to put together the prosperous economic state that he enjoys today," Maria Olivia Monckeberg, author of "The Looting of the Chilean State by the Economic Groups," told the New York Times. "He created a network of relatives and business partners that came to occupy the highest posts in some of the most important state companies, not just Soquimich, but also the state-owned copper and steel companies."

The Chilean taxpayer was not as fortunate, write Joseph Collins and John Lear in Multinational Monitor in 1991.

“Revenues from sales of public corporations provided one-time boosts to the government budget, allowing Pinochet the luxury of balancing the budget from 1986 through 1988, pleasing the IMF, making timely payments to foreign creditor banks and even cutting taxes,” write Collins and Lear. “However, since the companies sold had produced revenues for the government rather than deficits, such gains were brief and illusory.”

Today Ponce and his friends have continued to profit from the company, say Moneda Asset Management, a minority shareholder in SQM. They allege that Ponce and his friends conducted over 100 irregular purchases of shares between 2009 and 2011, which they used to make over $100 million in profits.

For example, Bloomberg writes that on March 29, 2011, Soc. de Inversiones Oro Blanco SA (a company controlled by Ponce) sold 163 million Soc. de Inversiones Pampa Calichera SA shares at 726 pesos, 10 percent below the previous day’s price, to Norte Grande and SQ Inversiones. On November 7 of the same year, Potasios de Chile SA bought 151 million shares in Calichera for 1064.53 pesos while SQ Inversiones sold 137 million at 1065 pesos.

Ponce has until the end of this month to explain the trades. Also charged are Aldo Motta, chief executive of Norte Grande and Roberto Guzman, an advisor to Ponce.

Ranger, your time is up NOW!

Debate warming up over Ranger mine future


NORTHERN TERRITORY: The operators of the Ranger uranium mine in the Northern Territory have unveiled a new water processing machine they say will give it a future beyond 2021.
But not everyone’s happy.
Mining has been completed at the site, which is located within – but is not a part of – the world heritage-listed Kakadu National Park, 260km southeast of Darwin.
It’s operated by Energy Resources Australia (ERA), which is owned by Rio Tinto.
The $220 million brine concentrator unveiled on Thursday will improve the mine’s ability to treat water and to progressively rehabilitate the site by 2026, when it must be of a standard to be reintegrated to Kakadu.
Traditional owners and environmental groups want to see ERA exit in 2021.
But if a second project currently in exploration turns out to be feasible, the brine concentrator may help them stay on if the relevant parties can be convinced it’s possible to mine in an environmentally safe way.
ERA’s chief executive Rob Atkinson says it’s too early to talk about future negotiations with stakeholders and the local community.
But he notes that previous attempts to treat water to a high standard were either too small for requirements or unsuccessful.
“This is the first time in ERA’s history producing very clean water at the quality we need,” he says.
“Without the brine concentrator I don’t believe we would have a future here at all.”
The brine concentrator took five years to be delivered from its conception, and has an output of 1.8 billion litres per year, or 800 Olympic pools of water free of radioactive contamination.
Managing water is at the heart of the mine’s considerations in the Top End, which experiences monsoonal rain for months on end every year, says operations manager Tim Eckersley.
“When you consider where we operate, the extremes of weather we experience, managing water is a critical component of operations,” he says.
In 2011, the mine had to shut down production for six months because of extensively contaminated water, says Justin O’Brien, CEO of the Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation (GAC) which manages mining royalties on behalf of the Mirarr people, the traditional owners of the land who opposed the mine’s development in 1978.
“With billions of (contaminated) litres sitting here and an Aboriginal community six kilometres downstream, that alarmed us,” he tells AAP.
The GAC sees the brine concentrator as a positive step towards keeping the water safe and clean, as does the Australian Conservation Foundation, calling it “overdue but welcome”.
“We don’t see (the brine concentrator) as meaning it will be okay for them to now dig a new underground mine at Ranger,” spokesman Dave Sweeney says.
“It’s technically feasible (they could continue mining after 2021), yes they could probably do it, but there’s these other factors that pose the question: is it really worth it?
“Are you prepared to own the consequent problems should you decide to go there?”
Although the Ranger mine is now only processing stockpiled ore as its open pits are slowly being backfilled, exploration for a possible underground mine is underway at a neighbouring site named Ranger 3 Deeps. If feasible, mining could begin in 2015, but would only be able to operate for five years under the current lease agreement.
Chief Minister Adam Giles, who is keen to see more mining in the NT, says Ranger was one of the most heavily regulated mines in the world.
“They put a lot of investment into environmental sustainability, as well as having the cultural obligations to be able to provide support for traditional owners, as well as seeking economic advancement,” he says.
But Mr O’Brien says traditional owners of the land want ERA to stick to the 2021 deadline.
“It’s never crossed our mind that they would mine beyond 2021,” he says. “They would need to be very persuasive and bring other things to the table were we to consider a new mining (permission), which is ultimately not our decision but that of the federal government.”
Since the Fukushima disaster of 2011 the uranium market has bottomed out, with prices dropping about 50 per cent, and it’s this that the Australian Conservation Foundation hopes will convince ERA’s owners Rio Tinto not to seek an extension should Ranger 3 Deeps prove viable beyond 2021.
“The only thing ERA do is mine uranium in Kakadu; (they’re) one of Kakadu’s endangered species,” Sweeney says.
But Rio Tinto may decide to walk away from the project at its mandated deadline.
“They will be acutely aware that they will be judged long into the future on how they exit Kakadu,” Sweeney says.
“If they cut corners, costs, and leave it a mess, that will hang over them and affect market access, other stakeholders’ confidence in the company, and future projects.”
But as the wet season looms and the brine concentrator begins churning out clean water, ERA insists it is only looking to 2021.
AAP

Looks like an intriguing watch on 4C on Monday night: PNG, corruption, 457 rorts, and money laundering in Oz

Preying on Paradise

By Marian Wilkinson and Lisa McGregor
Posted September 19, 2013 16:50:00
Preying on Paradise
(Photos by Louie Eroglu, Four Corners)
Monday 23 September 2013
A businessman in Papua New Guinea is accused of taking millions of dollars for government work that has never been completed. He is charged but released on bail. Then, using an Australian issued 457 Visa, he comes to this country and avoids justice, telling authorities he is too sick to travel back to PNG.
Crime fighters in Papua New Guinea say this type of behaviour is all too common:
"Their families are down in Australia and their property is down there. They gamble heavily in Australian casinos, they bring money from Papua New Guinea down to Australia. And the evidence is in - they use Australian bank accounts to launder PNG corruptly-obtained money."
Next on Four Corners, reporter Marian Wilkinson travels north to investigate the extent of corruption in Papua New Guinea and the apparent failure of Australian officials to play their part in tracking down stolen money. She speaks with the Prime Minister, Peter O'Neill, who tells her he's determined to stamp out behaviour that is undermining his country's future.
"Some of our own ministers have been investigated as we speak. Nobody has been protected by this government and I can assure you that we are committed to this fight that we have started..."
But how far does this commitment to stamp out corruption extend?
The Prime Minister of PNG has just announced the next stage of an ambitious plan - creating new laws that would bring the massive Ok Tedi copper mine into a financial trust that would control the country's key national assets. The Prime Minister tells Four Corners this will minimise the possibility of corrupt behaviour. Others warn this move is ill-advised and could, in fact, raise the risk of money being syphoned off.
"The danger could be that if the team decided that they really wanted to look after themselves, rather than the broader interests of the nation, they could do extremely well for themselves and the nation could be severely short-changed." Paul Barker, PNG Institute of National Affairs
Australians have a vested interest in stopping corruption in Papua New Guinea. The reality is that corruption there is indirectly costing Australian taxpayers millions of dollars. Each year the Federal Government delivers over $500 million in aid to our northern neighbour. At the same time corruption fighters in PNG claim 25 per cent of their country's budget is lost in detectable fraud. In effect, the aid sent north is being used in part to subsidise basic services when the PNG budget is being swindled away.
"I think Australia should really focus in helping us to combat corruption and to show the seriousness start repatriating proceeds of crime that are deposited in Australian bank accounts..." Sam Koim, Head of PNG's 'Task Force Sweep'
"Preying on Paradise", reported by Marian Wilkinson and presented by Kerry O'Brien, goes to air on Monday 23rd September at 8.30pm on ABC1. It is replayed on Tuesday 24th September at 11.35pm. It can also be seen on ABC News 24 on Saturday at 8.00pm, on ABC iview and at abc.net.au/4corners

World Day for Decent Work - October 7 - Please organise so that your voice can be heard


Website for World Day for Decent work on October 7 is here.

Since 2008 the ITUC has been organising the World Day for Decent Work (WDDW) on 7 October. It is a day for mobilisation for all trade unions across the globe, from Fiji in the east to Hawaii in the west. Every year we have hundreds of activities in a hundred countries, carried out by millions of people.

DOCUMENTS


Now - more than ever - you need to be in a union : waiting for Tony Abbott to have a second crack at WorkChoices


Our Sharan Burrow, who was ACTU President 2000-2010, is now the most senior union leader in the world. She was elected to the position of Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) in 2010 - the world trade union body representing 174 million workers in 156 countries. Not bad for a girl from Warren in country NSW!


Sharan leads the movement from Brussels, when she is not travelling the world speaking up for workers' rights everywhere.

Everyone's union activism starts somewhere, and for Sharan it was when she was a high school teacher in country NSW and was elected to be the local representative for the NSW Teachers Federation. She became the President of the Bathurst Trades and Labour Council and went on to hold positions with the NSW Teachers Federation before becoming President of the Australian Education Union and then President of the ACTU. Sharan left her position at the ACTU when she was elected as the first Australian and first woman to become the Secretary of the ITUC. The Australian union movement has produced many great leaders and fighters and we are proud of the work Sharan is doing on behalf of all workers.

Sharan was the ACTU President during some tough times under the previous Coalition Government and has sent this message to Australian union members. Share to spread the word.

Everyone's union story starts somewhere. Tell us yours in the comments below, or start yours today: www.australianunions.org.au/join





Cate Blanchett references Anne Summers on feminism: "Conservatism is affecting the way women perceive who they are in the world. "

Hollywood Feminist of the Day: Cate Blanchett

NEWS
BY KERENSA CADENAS
SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 1:30 PM
From here



While promoting Blue Jasmine in London, for which she's receiving considerable and much deserved Oscar buzz, Cate Blanchett described herself as a feminist and discussed how she feels women's equality is becoming lost and has not yet been remotely achieved. 
Blanchett mentioned that she had been reading a book by Australian feminist writer, Anne Summers, The Misogyny Factor and had realized within her reading that she felt that "all of the steps forward that we've made ... a lot of those have been rescinded." 
She also feels that conservative politics are harming women's perceptions of self. 
Conservatism is affecting the way women perceive who they are in the world. 
Blanchett was later asked about about Australia's first woman Prime Minister Julia Gillard who said she had been the subject of a sexist smear campaign. She agreed that Gillard was a target. 
Whether you admire her as a politician or not, as a woman and out of respect for the office of the prime minister, how she was treated was quite shocking. 
It's terrific having Blanchett self-identify as a feminist and speak out about women's issues in Australia so that others can get a more global perspective of the sexism that permeates around the world. 

Thursday, 19 September 2013

Help respond to weakened land clearing laws and Victorian native vegetation reforms which could wreak destruction on the bush

From: Yasmin Kelsall <YasminK@vnpa.org.au>
Date: Wednesday, 18 September 2013 8:03 AM
Subject: Joint Statement - Help respond to new Native Veg Policy

Dear friends,
 
We have drafted a joint statement (attached) that we intend to submit to the State Government and opposition in response to the Native Vegetation Policy that is due to pass through Parliament any day now.  If we get enough response we're also hoping to try for some media around this important issue. 
 
We're looking for as many community-based environment/Landcare groups or ecological organisations to sign on to this as possible. 
 
To sign on to the statement, simply reply by return email and attach the logo of your group.  It's fine if you don't have a logo - just let us know.   
We're hoping for responses by next Wednesday - 25th September.  Apologies for the short timeline.  Again let us know if you'd like to sign on but can't make the timeline. 
 
Please forward this on other colleagues and anyone else who may be interested.  In particular, if you happen to know of anyone who may be outside of the usual sphere of 'the converted' or someone who may be likely to get the Government's (or Opposition's) attention, please forward to them.  Or alternately let us know of anyone else (individuals/associations/organisations) that you think we should approach.   
 
Best wishes,
Yasmin

Yasmin Kelsall
VICTORIAN NATIONAL PARKS ASSOCIATION
Level 3, 60 Leicester St, Carlton Vic 3053
T: 03 9347 5188  F: 03 9347 5199 

Join us on Facebook

 ```````````````````````````
Save the bush !
Weakened Land Clearing Laws
 Joint Statement in Response to Victorian Native Vegetation Reforms
As ecologists, scientific experts, industry groups and community-based environment groups, representing thousands of Victorians, we are alarmed at the State Government’s dilution of Victoria’s Native Vegetation policy and are concerned that they will lead to increased land clearing
We value, care for and conserve the various habitats across the state and expect to see our government doing the same.  We want to see Native Vegetation policy in Victoria strengthened, not weakened.
The new native vegetation policy significantly weakens the protections for habitat, threatening the State’s biodiversity and its sustainability. Additionally, it compromises the value of native vegetation for landscape stability and amenity.
This comes on top of pressures from both urban and regional growth as well as agricultural intensification and fire management which are currently impacting on the vegetation remaining on freehold land across the State.  None of these issues were duly considered in developing the reforms.  Furthermore there are increasing pressures on vegetation within public land, such as the large-scale clearing of large old trees along fire trails.
We have the sad legacy of being the most cleared state in Australia.  This includes 80% of the original cover of native vegetation cover on private land[1] with a corresponding loss of biodiversity leading to a high proportion of threatened species[2].
Native vegetation not only provides a home to wildlife, it provides a safety net for all of us.  A 2002 study for the Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council[3] found that native vegetation in Australia provides approximately $1 trillion per year in value for preventing land degradation, and providing basic services like pollination and tourism value. 
State and Federal governments spend tens of millions of dollars per year on restoration and habitat protection supported by the community through Landcare and other regional networks. Tree-planting and habitat restoration is important, but must be done in conjunction with protecting remnant bushland – for both ecological and economic reasons. Reducing or stopping clearing is the best strategy we have and native vegetation regulation is an efficient way to do this. Native vegetation regulation was estimated to cost the Victorian economy $ 41 million per annum[4], this being significantly less than the amounts spent on land restoration.
Despite receiving over 200 submissions to the draft Consultation Paper for the Native Vegetation Reforms, of which the vast majority (approx. 80%) expressed concern at the proposed reforms, these concerns were disregarded and Victoria’s native vegetation permitted clearing regulations released without further opportunity for comment.
The reforms will create a new system where we will see:
·        A cash for clearing approach, where in almost all cases, permits will be granted provided an offsetting fee is paid.
·        Flawed maps for decision making based on biased and inadequate data and irresponsible assumptions
·        Nature losing its safety net, formerly provided by on-site expert assessments – how do you know what’s there if you don’t look?
We call on the Minister/ Premier to:
-         Move on from this flawed native vegetation policy and develop new standalone legislation that will truly ensure that Victoria’s unique natural values will be conserved on private land.
-         Make sure that decisions to clear native vegetation are based on the actual vegetation on the site, rather than flawed mapping.  If mapping is to be used to help decision makers, then make sure it accurately reflects habitat values.
-         Set a vision for biodiversity and native vegetation across the State.  This will address the gaping hole in current policy to guide subordinate policy of this kind.
-         Make the state government and public land managers subject to the same rules as private land.
-         Provide better planning support upfront to ensure that native vegetation is considered and large-scale clearing is avoided.  For example, when State Government decisions are being made about urban and regional land use and growth.
-         Provide upfront guidance for land managers who are seeking to intensify their agricultural production to ensure that native vegetation is considered upfront in their planning.
-         Support local government efforts to strengthen their local planning schemes, undertake compliance and enforcement and to better administer any native vegetation policy that falls within their primary responsibility.


[1] Department of Sustainability and Environment (2008) Native vegetation net gain accounting first approximation report.  State of Victoria, Melbourne
[2] Victorian Environmental Assessment Council (2010) Remnant Native Vegetation Investigation Discussion Paper, VEAC, East Melbourne
[3] Possingham H, Ryan S, Baxter J and Morton S(2002) Setting Biodiversity Priorities: a paper prepared as part of the activities of the working group
producing the report Sustaining our Natural Systems and Biodiversity for the Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council.
[4] Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission (2009) A Sustainable Future for Victoria: Getting Environmental Regulation Right Final Report, VCEC, Melbourne

Legal frameworks for the rights of nature : using the law to protect the environment

Image of Ninety Mile Beach Victoria, Western end

EDO Seminar Series

Legal frameworks for the rights of nature


Tuesday 1 October 2013, 5.45-7.30pm


The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund is working with communities in the United States and in countries around the world on grassroots organising, public education and outreach, research, and legislative drafting - assisting people, NGOs, elected representatives, and government officials to craft and adopt new laws that change the status of natural communities and ecosystems from being regarded as property under the law to being recognised as rights-bearing entities.

Through this work, the Legal Defense Fund has assisted more than three dozen communities in the U.S., and assisted the Constituent Assembly of Ecuador, to put in place a new paradigm to protect nature - a paradigm based on rights.

Come along and hear more about CELDF's work and join the discussion about how these ideas might be developed here.

Speakers:
  • Thomas Linzey, Director CELDF
  • Mari Margil, Associate Director CELDF

Book online now


This is a free event although donations are always welcome. Registration essential.

Date:  Tuesday 1 October 2013, 5.45 for 6pm start
Location:  Ground floor meeting rooms, 60 Leicester St, Carlton

In conjunction with Australian Earth Laws Alliance

Australia needs an economy that supports life – not pollutes it.

From Paul Sinclair at the Australian Conservation Foundation ~~~~

Brigid,
 
ACF had a simple story to tell before the federal election. Australia needs an economy that supports life – not pollutes it. We need clean energy, a safe climate, and a strong future for the indigenous people and ecosystems of Northern Australia.
Welcome to thousands of new supporters who jumped in during the election campaign. And for those with us for months, years, and decades, thank you. 
Our national media didn’t get around to covering the environment during the election. Disappointing. Even so, we reached hundreds of thousands of Australians online.
 
If you don't enable images, you won't see a cute koala.
 
It was no surprise that the Coalition won enough seats in the House of Representatives to form Government. But no one took bets on the Australian Sports Party or the Motoring Enthusiasts grabbing comfy Senate seats for the next six years. Seven independent senators might get elected.
 
The Senate is critical because it has the power to protect or repeal laws to reduce pollution or safeguard our environment. We’ll need your help telling the story of our economy and our environment to the new Senators and local representatives over coming months. 
 
Across the environment movement groups are joining forces on climate and environmental laws. On big issues – like the Coalition’s plan to roll back World Heritage protection for Tasmania’s forests – industry, union and environment groups are working together. These are good signs.
 
I have a post-it note on my desk with a quote from Nelson Mandela scrawled on it,
 
“Time and again, conflicts are resolved through shifts that were unimaginable at the start”.
Now is the time to reach out and form new alliances, creating new stories of the kind of world we want to live in.
What are the environmental issues that matter most to you?
Leave a comment and I'll weigh in on how ACF is tackling these issues. 
 

JOIN THE DISCUSSION 

 
Dr Paul Sinclair
Director of Environmental Campaigns
 

Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Hanging Rock is at risk according to the locals ... yet it is important to ALL OF US. Please sign the petition.



and you will see why Hanging Rock is important
to Australians.

Hello Everyone,

Help needed, and it won’t take but a moment of your time. 

Here in Macedon Ranges Shire we have a terrible council.  It thinks it can operate and make decisions in isolation of and without consulting its community, while making the community pay for its decisions. 

Recently Macedon Ranges council took this culture a step too far.   It deliberately resolved (not once, but twice) to apply for funding for a conference centre (and other large-scale development) at Hanging Rock and to not consult the community on the development or funding.  

Hanging Rock does not belong to Macedon Ranges’ council officers and 5 of 9 councillors!  It is an international icon; it belongs to the people of Macedon Ranges, Victoria, and Australia.   Yet our council has shut everyone out.  It’s making big decisions on our behalf – and on yours – without us having a say.   We want our council to know this is not acceptable, and to rethink its decision.

The first favour we ask of you is PLEASE, PLEASE SIGN THE ONLINE PETITION “HANGING ROCK FOR SALE – HAVE YOUR SAY” by going to
This petition has been authored and started by local residents in the Hanging Rock area community.  MRRA is supporting this initiative.

The second favour we ask is PLEASE, PLEASE SEND THIS EMAIL AROUND TO YOUR FRIENDS AND CONTACTS AND ASK THEM TO SIGN THE PETITION AS WELL. 

Here’s what some people are saying:

“If you have visited the Rock at some stage in your life you know the beauty and mysteriousness of the area, if you have not visited the Rock please google it and you will see what I mean.  I live near the Rock and drive past it every day to and from work and it never ceases to amaze me because I see the same view but it’s different.  I implore you to sign this petition to put a stop to the suggested development around the area of the Rock;  Landcare has spent 10 years building up the wildlife corridor here and as usual greedy people just want to tear the bush down and put in concrete.  Once you have signed it please email this to all your friends so we can save a natural beauty so close to Melb for visitors.”  Toni

“Development such as that being proposed by MRSC in an area protected by an environmental overlay is totally inappropriate.  It goes against all that this Landcare group has been working towards over a 10 year period!  The East paddock area was purchased to buffer the reserve at Hanging Rock - a haven for wild-life and city-weary folks.  So please add your name to the petition Luke has prepared and send it [the link] to your friends.”  Penny

As you can see, this awful decision affects many people and impacts many (irreplaceable) values.  
Many thanks for your help.

Christine Pruneau,
Secretary,
Macedon Ranges Residents’ Association Inc.

Total Pageviews