Saturday, 4 December 2010

Under the LibNat Coalition, where is environmental sustainability going?

clip_image002

Almost eighteen months ago, this media release was issued to announce the appointment of Dr Kate Auty to the position of Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability.  Now the Baillieu Government has been sworn in, it is time to ask what is going to happen to this office.  I have gone over to the Liberal Party website to see what I could find – and, particularly, looking for the key words sustainability and environment.  That turned out to be an ‘interesting’ exercise – considering we are just concluding the last decade of the 21st century.

I can find a heading for Secure Water and a Healthy Environment.  I already had a copy of The Victorian Liberal Nationals Coalition Plan for Water. I have been over the Plan for Water with a fine tooth comb. Now sometimes I am blind as the proverbial bat – but I can’t see reference to the Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability.  There is to be the establishment of a Living Victoria program…but all the references to that are about water and the Minister for Water (Nationals Deputy Leader and former Victorian Farmers Federation President) Peter Walsh will oversee the program.

There is a section on the website titled Recent Policy Announcements. and it contains a section called Agriculture & Environment. The headlines of the announcements are all rural, regional and agriculturally referenced.  Doesn’t look like a whole of Victoria policy at all.

So where are we.  I can understand – well, sort of – if the Liberal and the Nationals judged that the electorate might have been/be more concerned about other issues like cost of living; public transport; health; schools, etc.  Now the election is over and everyone is safely esconced in their democratic oversight positions, it would be nice to see heads turned to letting us know what they really plan to do on issues of environmental sustainability. 

All the above election issues are important. However, we are – first and foremost – human beings living in an endogenous context which is not faring too darn well.  Those election issues exist within that context too.  If we are not managing our living space well and sustainably we are not going to manage those election grabbers very well either. 

So, in the hope that someone who knows something about Liberal National Coalition Policies reads this, could you please post some enlightening comment below so we have an idea – if only a rough one – about how where we all live at the Victorian end of things is going to be managed.

Media release

From the Minister for Environment and Climate Change

 
  clip_image003

Friday, 19 June, 2009

NEW COMMISSIONER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

Kate-Auty.rightEnvironmental scientist and former magistrate Dr Kate Auty has been appointed the new Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability.

Environment and Climate Change Minister Gavin Jennings said Dr Auty begins in the role today replacing Dr Ian McPhail who recently completed his five year term as Commissioner.

“With the appointment of Dr Auty to this important position, the Brumby Labor Government is taking action to ensure that the high quality environmental reporting of the Government’s activities continues for the benefit of all Victorians,” Mr Jennings said.

“The Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability has a significant role to play in environmental reporting and public education, so I am very pleased that we have someone with Dr Auty’s experience to take on the role.

“I look forward to working with Dr Auty in her new role to achieve the best results for Victoria’s environment. We’ve got a great platform for the Commissioner to build from but there is more to do.

“I’d also like to thank Dr McPhail for his dedication over the past five years as the inaugural Victorian Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability.”

Before accepting the role, Dr Auty distinguished herself as Chairperson of the Ministerial Reference Council on Climate Change Adaptation and as a member of the Premier of Victoria’s Reference Committee on Climate Change.

Dr Auty brings extensive legal and academic background including post-graduate qualifications in environmental science.

Dr Auty signed the Victorian Bar Roll in 1992, and was appointed a Victorian Magistrate in 1999. She established the first Victorian Koori Court and acted as inaugural Koori Court Magistrate.

From 2004–2009 Dr Auty was a Magistrate in Western Australia. She has undertaken a number of consultancies including a project on local government and climate change for the National Environmental Law Association.

Business engagement with water: a policy is released

So much is heard of altering household consumption and altering individual behaviour patterns to bring about changed attitudes to water consumption and conservation.  It seems to me that few case histories of business adaptation make it into the popular media to let us know what business can do and what they are doing.  So, to highlight the role of business and how it can contribute to better water management at the commercial and industrial level, I am putting these documents front and centre.  If thinking on water hasn't got far in your firm or company or corporate institution, here's a good place to start.

Guide to Responsible Business Engagement with Water Policy Released

responsible_business_engagement_cover.jpgWith water issues among the world's most critical sustainability challenges, businesses are facing increasing water-related risk to their operations. The just-releasedGuide to Responsible Business Engagement with Water Policy from the UN Global Compact CEO Water Mandate provides strategies for companies to turn risk into opportunity by advocating for water management approaches that meet the needs of business, communities, and nature.
"The bottom line is that what is good for communities, for public water management, and for the environment is also in the best interest of companies working to ensure their access to water in the long term," said Jason Morrison, director of the Pacific Institute's Globalization Program and coauthor of the Guide. "With increased threats to the supply, quality, and reliability of water resources, companies cannot reduce their risk through changes in internal management alone."
The Guide to Responsible Business Engagement with Water Policy, drafted by the Pacific Institute in its capacity as the "operational arm" of the CEO Water Mandate, helps redefine the way businesses respond to water challenges, focusing on the shared interests between the public and private sectors.
The Guide outlines five principles for responsible business engagement with water policy: a genuine interest in efficient, equitable, and ecologically sustainable water management; a clear division of public and private sector roles, with businesses supporting the government's mandate; inclusiveness and meaningful partnership; recognition of the connections between water and other policy arenas; and corporate transparency and accountability for their actions. 

Read the Guide here  Download below:

THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


THE FULL DOCUMENT

Friday, 3 December 2010

Write to Joe Ludwig and Julia Gillard to stop live animal exports


TAKE ACTION

Now that the 7.30 Report has alerted the Australian public to the horrific cruelty that our live export industry is responsible for, our Government is under intense pressure to respond. Australia now has a new Agriculture minister who is willing to meet withand listen to animal welfare advocates about the inherent problems of live animal export. Please help spare millions more animals from suffering by sending a short, polite message to encourage Minister Ludwig to ban the cruel live export trade:

        Senator Joe Ludwig
        Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
        Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600
        Tel: (02) 6277 7200
        E-mail: senator.ludwig@aph.gov.au

Please also send a brief e-mail to our prime minister.



I hope you were able to view the results of our seventh investigation into the Live Export Industry on the 7.30 Report last night (if not, click here to watch it online). Tragically, what the ABC aired was merely a glimpse ofwhat my co-investigator and I witnessed in the Middle East during the Festival of Sacrifice last month — Australian animals bound with wire, dragged, and shoved into car boots before being brutally killed in the streets.

Some 22 million sheep have been exported to Kuwait over the past 20 years. To visit this country again and witness even more brutal treatment of animals on this occasion was near soul destroying. As an investigator unable to intervene, all I can do is make a commitment to them that their suffering will not be in vain; that we will do everything in our power to ensure that their suffering will heighten calls for live export to end.

Change is desperately needed in the Middle East — and this will not occur whilst a country such as Australia sets an example that it is acceptable to send animals halfway around the world only to be slaughtered. The damaging message that Australia's live export industry sets by its mere existence is that animals are nothing more than chattels to be traded and slaughtered for profit.

Australian animals need live export to end, but so do all animals in the Middle East. They need a nation to set an example that will inspire change — that will send a clear message to the region that animals and their welfare matters.

Please help us to call upon our government to end the live export trade.

By sending a quick, polite message to our Prime Minister and Agriculture minister, you will show that Australians want this cruel trade to end. I've included their contact details above. Your letter or e-mail need only be very brief. Your help today truly can make a huge difference. 

Thank you for helping me to be a voice for these animals,
Lyn
Lyn White
Animals Australia Investigator & Campaign Director

Rowan Barber: Business Water Efficiency Program, Queensland

Rowan Barber is a Water Warrior colleague in Brisbane -
oh! - and don't forget sanitation, too.
Rowan has asked for the letter below to be widely circulated.
The Network is only to happy to oblige.
Rowan wants to encourage others to respond to him
with feedback and/or reinforce
the message with the Minister (as people see fit)


From: Rowan Barber <rowan@asbg.net.au>
Date: Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:49 AM
Subject: Business Water Efficiency Programme
To: naturalresources@ministerial.qld.gov.au
Cc: Premiers@ministerial.qld.gov.ausustainability@ministerial.qld.gov.au, Andrew <andrew@asbg.net.au>, Darren Oemcke <darren@doconsulting.com.au>


Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade
The Honourable Stephen Robertson


cc: The Premier, the Hon. Kate Jones, ASBG, 

Dear Mr Robertson,

Further to your Ministerial Statement below, I would like to put a case forward for another round of the "Business Water Efficiency Programme" (BWEP) or facsimile.

In 2006 the Queensland Government allocated $55 million toward BWEP.  It was an incentive program and although related to, it was distinct from the Queensland Water Commission (QWC)’s business water restrictions.  The QWC imposed restrictions were mandatory.  BWEP offered funding to certain businesses to support the implementation of water saving projects to meet QWC restrictions.

Many businesses missed out on the opportunity to apply for and receive BWEP funding.  As the costs of water continues to increase, water efficiency projects will become more viable but there is still a case for business assistance.

regards,

Rowan Barber
State Manager
Australian Sustainable Business Group

t: 07 3839 5335
m: 0428 227 266

Patrick Dodson: Aboriginal inclusion in constitutional & institutional frameworks


Patrick Dodson has posted an article in On Line Opinion to-day entitled Can Australia Afford Not To Be Reconciled?

Patrick's article is wide-ranging and covers:
  • The proposed referendum
  • The rights of indigenous peoples
  • Dialogue
  • The Intervention
  • The assimilation push across Australia
  • Reconciliation
  • Global consequences and connections with domestic injustice
  • Climate change
  • Environmental destruction
  • Incorporation of indigenous peoples into planning and decision-making
  • The Place of Aboriginal people in Australia's constitutional and institutional frameworks
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Baillieu Liberal Government of Victoria–the cabinet list

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 2 December 2010

Baillieu Govt & Water: Walsh is Minister for Water: kids run the lolly shop

There is more than one Peter Walsh in Victoria 
and one of them has become Minister for Water
 in the new Baillieu Liberal/National Coalition Government.
~~~~~~~~~

It is actually more boring than that.

Peter Walsh was born and raised at Boort in Northern Victoria, attending Fernihurst Primary School and Boort Secondary College before operating an irrigation and horticultural property in the district.
He has represented the Swan Hill Electorate in the Legislative Assembly since 2002 and is the Deputy Leader of the Nationals and Shadow Minister for Agriculture and Country Water Resources.
He is also a member of Parliament’s Environment and Natural Resources Committee.
Peter’s other roles have included -
  • President, Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) – 1998-2002
  • Director, SPC Limited – 1995-2002
  • Board Member, National Farmers Federation (NFF)
  • Member of the Institute of Company Directors.
Peter was awarded a Centenary Medal in 2003 for services to the environment.
(from his website)
WHAT HAS NOW HAPPENED IS THAT
THE KIDS ARE IN CHARGE
OF THE LOLLY SHOP
Agribusiness and the agricultural lobby now control water policy in Victoria.  They have wrecked the Murray-Darling Basin system and are not talking of budging a millimetre to find solutions.  They criticise urban areas for their water use while unable to take criticism themselves.  


One can guarantee that the state of Victoria will be highly critical of ANYTHING the Murray Darling Basin Authority does or doesn't do or say.  This lobby is out for revenge and self-justification. This could be a good thing. It could be a bad thing. Either way, taxpayers of Victoria get set to see your dollars literally go bush. Here is some of the stuff they want, taken from a document titled The Victorian Liberal Nationals Coalition Plan for Water (see document embedded below).

LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT HOW THE NATIONAL PARTY
FIEFDOM ON WATER MIGHT BE EXPLOITED
  • Under the proposed Living Victoria program, the Minister for Water will have the authority to fast track projects which are deemed to meet the criteria for making a significant contribution to Living Victoria by giving them major project status, without compromising transparency and community engagement. (For insight into what is proposed by the Living Victoria program, please go to the document embedded above.) (Page 10)
  • There will be an independent judicial inquiry to investigate the probity of Labor's decision making in the implementation of the Food Bowl project and the north-south pipeline and the social, economic and environmental impacts this project is having on communities throughout Northern Victoria. (Page 14)
  • The Liberal Nationals Coalition does not support the guide to the draft of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan.  The guide is not balanced and does not account for the devastating impacts these cuts to water entitlements will have on food producing communities in northern Victoria. (Page 15)
  • While the paragraph following the above says that 'communities are prepared to have a conversation about protecting the health of the Murray-Darling Basin', there are no guarantees that the Liberal National Party Coalition through the National Party's Minister for Water will not join the intransigence of the irrigators' lobby which saw a Nazi-like burning of the guide simply because there was/is a view abroad that the MDBA Guide does not support irrigator ideology which wants only one thing - to amend the Commonwealth Water Act (although my view is that is code for wanting to repeal the existing act and introduce a Water Act which suits themselves).  It should be borne in mind, Networkers, that the Howard Govt introduced the act in 2007 with ALP support.  The Rudd government, in 2008, with the support of the Liberal Opposition made some facilitating amendments. Any legislative setback ensures that the agricultural/development induced mess that is the Murray-Darling Basin will take longer to resolve, if it ever does!
  • Arrangements will be put in place allowing customers to elect 50 per cent of the board members of the four rural water authorities (Lower Murray, Goulburn Murray, Grampians Wimmera Mallee and Southern Rural).  (Page 26)  So one class of persons in selected areas can be elected to water authorities - but in other places, nuh, don't bother.  One of the problems in water in Victoria is  playing off, one against the other, urban and rural interests.  Another is lack of consumer and community input.  All water instrumentalities need to have community representatives elected to water authorities in Victoria  in well-promoted , well-managed elections.


To bring some sanity into all of this, I would commend to the new Minister for Water that he reads, if he has not already, J.M. Powell's Watering the Garden State: water, land and community in Victoria 1834-1988.  Particularly, it would be nice to know that the quote below is read and taken to heart by the Minister for Water.  Powell sourced the quote from Sewell, Smth and Handmer, 'From myths to reality: the evolution of Australian water planning' in their compilation Water Planning in Australia, pp 223-6, 1985.


Table 4 Major Australian 'water myths'
1. 'Water is a Free Good'
(a) Incomplete or nil charges for water withdrawals, flood protection, waste disposal. Water services prices do not match supply costs. Recreation excluded from protected catchments and reservoirs.
(b) Real values not incorporated in choice of use; encourages unlimited, protected occupation of floodplains; assumes that public, not polluter, should pay costs.  Subsidies; waster of water; inappropriate uses; postponement of consideration of optimum uses. Supports single value uses; disadvantages some groups.
2. 'Water Can Be Managed In Isolation'
(b) Need to reconcile inter-agency conflicts - drinking water v irrigation, etc.  Need to reconcile competing mandates - recreation v water supply, etc. Resolution of competing inter-agency jurisdictions and objectives - hydro-electricity v heritage preservation. Overlooks place of water in social and economic development.
3. 'The Desert Will Bloom'
(a) Vast irrigation schemes, current and projected.
(b) Environmental effects and economic profitability require assessment.
4. 'Social Values Are Fixed'
(a) Inflexible water legislation.
(b) Ignores rapidly changing national and international pressures and preferences.
5. 'Water Management Is Mainly For Technical Experts'
(a) Domination of water agencies by engineers/water scientists; search for a 'technical fix' is increasing; minimal provision for public involvement.
(b) Multi-faceted nature of problems ignored; less expensive, environmentally benign solutions overlooked or downgraded; forgets that 'public' contains some equally well-qualified experts; does not harness public concern; misses opportunities for monitoring changing values.

Please note that the above
was published twenty-five years ago.
I will leave it to Networkers to assess
the bleeding obvious.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

Ballerrt Mooroop College: the bulldozers are coming to an Aboriginal school near you

From the Melbourne Anti-Intervention Collective:



Will it only be a matter of weeks before the Liberal/National Coalition sends in the bulldozers to a Victorian school?

The Department of Education has approved the construction of a new school directly on the land of Ballerrt Mooroop College in Glenroy.  To make way for this new school, the Aboriginal community is losing its gymnasium and its ceremonial grounds. 

Why must this new school be built on Aboriginal land – the only Aboriginal school in Melbourne?
Aboriginal people deserve the right to educate their children in their own culture, with full access to the best resources.  There was no proper consultation with the school community when this decision was made.  Melbourne Anti-Intervention Collective has been campaigning in support of Aboriginal self-determination and against the attacks on bi-lingual education as part of our fight against the Northern Territory Intervention. 

The undermining of Aboriginal education can be seen as part of the renewed framework of racist assimilation policies which the NT Intervention has spearheaded.  The ideology that was behind John Howard’s racist Intervention, that has been continued with vigour by Labor, has now found its way to Melbourne. An attack on an Aboriginal school is an act of cultural genocide and we ask people to join this protest to take a stand for Aboriginal rights.

We also welcome people to join us on the picket line 
at the Ballert Mooroop College on 17 December 2010.  
This is the date when the bulldozers are scheduled to roll in.
melbourneaic@gmail.com
~~~~


A recent letter from the school seeking support:



INVITATION TO BECOME AN OFFICIAL

“FRIEND OF BALLERRT MOOROOP COLLEGE”



We would love you to become an official friend of our College!

Our College is a small and important government pathways school for Koorie young people, especially those facing very big challenges in life.

We renamed our school in Woiwurrung language, the language of the Wurundjeri people here in Melbourne.  ‘Ballerrt Mooroop’ means ‘Strong Spirit’.

We have great successes already but as our students say “We want to show how smart we are”.  To do this, we will have to work very hard.  We will also need lots of support and encouragement.

We want to contribute to our Community and our Country.  We are judged the second most disadvantaged school community in Victoria, but we intend to be warriors and overcome this.

We would love you to become an official friend and supporter of our College.

What would being our friend mean?

  • Just know we are here!
  • Receive a regular letter and photo about what we are doing
  • Pass on good ideas to us.

It won’t cost you anything, it just might benefit you.  Just being our ‘friend’ will make us feel special, valued, encouraged and supported.

So please think about this, just a little, then send us an email and tell us you’d love to be our friend!

Kind regards,

Students,  School Council and Staff of
Enhanced by Zemanta

King Brown Country - Russell Skelton, Fred Cheney, Michael Cathcart: Sack Macklin Protest: Alison Anderson


I have been keeping you posted, Networkers, on the Sack Macklin Protest which was held last evening outside Readings in Carlton.  It was a great success in many ways - even before we got there. Jenny Macklin - who was to be in conversation with Russell Skelton the author of King Brown Country - withdrew from the event. This was because of "security reasons" we have been informed.  Clearly, she was afraid of the terrorists of the Melbourne Anti-Intervention Collective.

Somewhere in all this the man from the Australian Federal Police turned up and spoke to one of our number who knew his name.  He says he now looks forward to seeing happy snaps of himself when relevant files are opened in decades to come.  It is a comfort to know that even if the majority of Melbournians didn't know about us, someone is still watching over us.

Click to enlarge.
Sharon Firebrace, Alex Ettling, Keith Kaulfuss.

My guess is that somewhere upward of 50 people gathered outside Readings.  The footpath was packed. People spilled from the kerb onto the roadway.  People not connected with the protest but who were coming to Readings for the book launch paused to take in the event.  Speeches were made. Street seating made great platforms for the speakers.  Connections were drawn between The Intervention in the Northern Territory and the threatened closure of Ballert Mooroop College here in Melbourne.


An audience of somewhere around 50 people gathered in Readings for the launch of King Brown Country with Fred Cheney in conversation and Michael Cathcart facilitating.  Interesting and interested faces in the crowd included Petro Georgiou, John Cain, Sister Joan Hamilton, John Safran and Diane de Vere along with sundry people, including Miss Eagle, who have an intimate knowledge of matters Aboriginal and places of the Northern Territory.

If Russell Skelton thought this was going to be a nice book launch in arguably the trendiest bookshop in Melbourne with a receptive audience, then the event turned out quite differently. Even Fred Cheney, who does not have a reputation as a controversialist, interpolated in sheer exasperation with some of Skelton's views.  There were knowledgable people in the audience who questioned him closely or made statements - and many  of these 'contra' views were well applauded by the receptive audience. 

If anyone believes that support for Aboriginal self-determination and a better life for the citizens of Australia's First Nations is restricted to pinkos, lefties and greenies, then last night was visible evidence for support for Aboriginal people from both sides of the political spectrum.  Somewhere between the don't cares and don't wants are people who can talk to one another across the political divide in positive ways with the aim of seeking better solutions.  

It is fair to say that the audience for King Brown Country came down hard on methods of governance, politicians and bureaucrats. Policies announced but unfulfilled or long postponed. Bureaucrats and ministers on a roller blind. A minister in the Howard Government who was just getting on top of the portfolio was changed to something else. Bureaucrats that come and go so no lasting  relationships or long term knowledge building are possible. Bureaucrats that don't even go, and rule from afar - without knowledge, without expertise.  It was also made plain by Fred Cheney and supported by the audience that Aboriginal citizens could not be subjected to one-size-fits-all policy templates.  Solutions needed to be diverse, customised to specific communities and their particular and individual needs.

And, it must be noted, Alison Anderson was defended.

I purchased my copy of the book.  I didn't bother to do the usual and get the author to sign it. I found Russell Skelton, at this book launch, less than impressive.

Further reading:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Total Pageviews