Monday 6 July 2015

Introducing ... the Australian Climate Roundtable. Now let's see who blinks first on Climate Change!

This post comes from the website of Austrralian Coastal Councils Assocation Inc.
 --- thx to friend of The Network, Maria Riedl.
Please take time too visit their beautiful site.
This is organisations doing for themselves what the Australian Goverrnment is refusing to do.
All I can say to these organisations is:
Good on you.
Congratulations.
But what took you so long?
Giving the Abbott Government a long lead to prove how intransigent it can be?

One also wonders, giving those involved in the Australian Climate Roundtable, how much support - donations, backing, etc - will be withdrawn from the Abbott Government and how much pressure will be placed on Labor to bring forward sensible, practical, well-thought out, convincing policy on Climate Change without resorting to pink batts type policies.




POWERFUL ALLIANCE FORMED TO PROMOTE COMMON GROUND ON CLIMATE CHANGE


An alliance of major business, union, environment, investor and social organisations has been formed with the objective of  ‘putting the climate policy debate on common ground and offering a way forward’.
The alliance, called the Australian Climate Roundtable, includes
  • The Australian Aluminium Council,
  • The Australian Conservation Foundation,
  • The Australian Council of Social Service,
  • The ACTU,
  • The Australian Industry Group,
  • The Business Council of Australia,
  • The Energy Supply Association of Australia,
  • The Investor Group on Climate Change,
  • The Climate Institute and
  • WWF Australia.
The organisations in the Roundtable have been meeting in secret for more than a year to discuss how to tackle the issue. “This is born of collective frustration,” Matthew Warren, the chief executive of the Energy Supply Association of Australia, told The Guardian.
A statement issued by the Roundtable said the organisations had come together ‘because climate change and climate policy both impact our missions and our members.’ The statement went on to say: ‘We believe Australia should play its fair part in global efforts to avoid 2° centigrade and the serious economic, social and environmental impacts that unconstrained climate change would have on Australia.’
In an effort to put an end to the political debate on climate change the alliance has identified a set of principles to guide future Australian climate policy. The principles include that climate change should:
  • drive domestic abatement wherever it is efficient and internationally recognised across all sectors of the Australian economy;
  • make use of internationally recognised abatement from overseas to ease the transition towards net zero emissions;
  • recognise the strategic importance of reducing emissions from the energy sector in achieving the overall goal; and
  • use any revenue resulting from climate policy to address legitimate needs directly related to climate policy, and otherwise be returned to businesses and individuals.
The principles demand a policy that allows Australia to play a fair role in limiting global warming to 2°C and eventually achieves no net greenhouse emissions – meaning more emissions are taken out of the atmosphere or bought from overseas than emitted by activities in Australia.
John Connor, the chief executive of the Climate Institut, said the aim of the alliance is to ‘reset the tumultuous debate and try to establish a civil and constructive discussion.’ “We are offering ourselves as a sounding board for all parties to test and discuss their policies,” he said.
Jennifer Westacott, chief executive of the Business Council of Australia, said: “There is now overwhelming common ground on the need for a more certain and meaningful approach to emissions reduction”.
More information about the Roundtable is available at –

No comments:

Post a Comment

This blog does not take Anonymous comments. Experience shows that comments cluttered with "Anonymous" are boring and people don't know whether "Anonymous" is one person or many. This is not a decision about freedom of speech. It is a decision about boring or unwillingness to be known by even a pseudonym.

Total Pageviews