Showing posts with label Mergers and Takeovers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mergers and Takeovers. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 August 2012

Xstrata watch: will the proposed merger with Glencore proceed? Qatar and Norway opposed.

Regular readers of The Network will know that I keep a watching brief on Xstrata.  I do this because of connections with Mount Isa and McArthur River - both sites of mining activity by the Swiss-headquartered Xstrata in Australia.  For previous posts relating to Xstrata on this blog, please go here.

The watch on XStrata is becoming more frequent because of a proposed merger between Xstrata and Glencore which would put the merged corporation up there with the really big boys of Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton.  In the background, just to add some spice to the narrative, is the Qatar Investment Authority.  All this is covered in the blogs at the link above.  New Networkers will need to delve into these to begin to understand the whole story.

A lot of background noise goes on in Australia around Gina Rinehart and Twiggy Forest.  Understandable in the case of Rinehart, the world's richest woman, but not so much in the case of Twiggy who has quite a few shadows in his background.  Real stories will always be about the biggest and the best and the most international.  Xstrata and Glencore are both international mining corporations - in the case of Glencore, they have a wider reach and have become known as a commodities based corporation.

Merger discussions and manoeuvres have been going on - well, on and off to be precise - during 2012.  Currently, the talk is about whether a proposed decision/meeting will go ahead as proposed on September 7.  So, because there is a due date, people around the world are watching with bated breath.

Yesterday, shares tumbled in price following news that not only was Qatar opposing the merger but Norway had now enjoined the opposition. Norway's oil-based sovereign wealth fund has been in the market buying shares and, while their holding is a long way off that of the Qatar's, their stance on the merger is significant and influential.

Another influential with a negative view to the proposed merger is PIRC - the UK's leading independent research and advisory consultancy providing services to institutional investors on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.  PIRC has outlined to investors a number of reasons why the merger should be opposed.

Meanwhile, over in Qatar they are hitching up their skirts or rolling up their sleeves - depending on your metaphorical view.  Qatar is not happy with the merger because the pay-off for them is not as good as it should and could be.  However, Qatar has provided assurances to Xstrata that, in the event the proposed merger is not given the go-ahead, then it will up its stake in Xstrata.  Between the devil and the deep blue sea?  Xstrata currently seems to lie somewhere between Glencore and Qatar.

So in all this pushing and shoving, Glencore becomes the focus of the wait and see game.  With opposition to the merger mounting, will Glencore hold its ground or will it increase its offer in some way or another?  Or will it give the Kenny Rogers response?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 27 August 2012

Mining and Resources: Xstrata and Glencore merger in doubt?


Miss Eagle keeps a bit of a watch on Xstrata because of Mount Isa and McArthur River connections.  I recently did a number of posts related to the proposed merger of Xstrata and Glencore.  To see them, please go here.

To-day, Australian Mining reports that there is doubt about whether the merger will proceed.  A number of questions are raised in this Guardian article.

Later on Monday afternoon, Crikey is talking about the Xstrata-Glencore deal.  Please find the article here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

Speak Mandarin, Cantonese, Shanghainese ... what about Arabic to negotiate Gulf States money?


I recently said in a post "all is connected".  It is amazing just what is connected. Again, Networkers, please be patient while I ask you to follow this very long and winding piece of string.

Does your waste collection, your water involve Veolia?  A share holder is the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA).  Down at Wonthaggi, the world's fifth largest desalination plant is under construction.  The major water technology player is Suez. A share holder is QIA.  Enjoying, like mois, the professionalism of English language telecaster AlJazeera? Look behind and you will find QIA.  A subsidiary of QIA - Qatar's sovereign wealth fund - is Qatar Holding (QH).  If you have been reading Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series, QH is right thereQH will pop up again in the course of this post.

And now let's take a look at the Land of Oz. If political and corporate players are learning to speak Mandarin, Cantonese or ShanghaineseI can't help wondering what politicians or business executives speak Arabic?  You see, while the Chinese frequently make the news in relation to mining and agricultural investment, the subsidiaries of the Qatar Investment Authority scarcely rate a blip on the national radar.

BTW, you might like to take a look at the Board of Qatar Holding.  If you think women are having trouble getting on Boards in Australia, my guess is that Qatar won't be having any women on any boards any time soon.

Now for what I consider the really important stuff as far as Australia is concerned.

QH is the second largest shareholder in international mining conglomerate Xstrata.  I am embedding below an Xstrata Zinc Sustainability Report from which, Networkers, you will be able to ascertain not only the extent of Xstrata business in Australia, but its international presence as well.  Please note the marvellous picture (somewhat manipulated, methinks) of Mount Isa in north-west Queensland. Please go here and insert "Australia" to find more about Xstrata in Australia.

It seems Asia hasn't made it on to the Xstrata scene yet.  Funny that...!

At the moment, Xstrata is being being courted.  All was a-flutter earlier this year with a Glencore-Xstrata merger looking highly likely. Shareholder meetings to ratify the merger have been postponed but now a meeting looks likely to proceed in September. That was reported on July 12. To-day, it is reported that Qatar is active in the market buying shares. There is a lot at stake in this stoush.  Synergies are being touted as a plus for the merger: Xstrata's mining and Glencore's marketing.  Glencore clearly has ethics problems and seems to be a corporation prepared to do whatever it takes. Clearly, Qatar does not want to be squeezed out even if or, more likely, the proposed merger of Xstrata and Glencore if and when established will rival BHPBilliton for size and reach.  If Qatar is active in the market, it is clear that QH does not wish to be left an also ran in the race.

So, Networkers, keep eyes and ears peeled on this latest saga impacting on Australia's mining boom.

Oh, a political footnote.  Remember back to the mining tax ruckus which resulted in Rudd's resignation (or doing-over depending on your point of view)?  The ruckus, you will recall, was mainly caused by the "junior miners" such as TwiggyGina, Clive and their friends.  The "senior miners"  like Rio and BHPB act a bit differently.  The "senior miners" are the ones who got to the negotiating table and Twiggy, Clive and Gina didn't.  They have been sour about this ever since.  However, the then new Prime Minister Julia Gillard negotiated not only with Rio and BHPB. Xstrata quietly came to the table.  

My view is that Xstrata was not only there because of its size.  It was there because of its relationship with the Australian Workers Union (AWU), particularly in connection with the Mount Isa facility.  The AWU put Gillard where she is so that a pragmatic version of the mining tax could be sorted out and the AWU could have a role without being forced backwards in the deal.  A clever use of this blog's search and label facilities should flesh this idea out for you, Networkers.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Total Pageviews