Showing posts with label Investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Investment. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 August 2012

Xstrata watch: will the proposed merger with Glencore proceed? Qatar and Norway opposed.

Regular readers of The Network will know that I keep a watching brief on Xstrata.  I do this because of connections with Mount Isa and McArthur River - both sites of mining activity by the Swiss-headquartered Xstrata in Australia.  For previous posts relating to Xstrata on this blog, please go here.

The watch on XStrata is becoming more frequent because of a proposed merger between Xstrata and Glencore which would put the merged corporation up there with the really big boys of Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton.  In the background, just to add some spice to the narrative, is the Qatar Investment Authority.  All this is covered in the blogs at the link above.  New Networkers will need to delve into these to begin to understand the whole story.

A lot of background noise goes on in Australia around Gina Rinehart and Twiggy Forest.  Understandable in the case of Rinehart, the world's richest woman, but not so much in the case of Twiggy who has quite a few shadows in his background.  Real stories will always be about the biggest and the best and the most international.  Xstrata and Glencore are both international mining corporations - in the case of Glencore, they have a wider reach and have become known as a commodities based corporation.

Merger discussions and manoeuvres have been going on - well, on and off to be precise - during 2012.  Currently, the talk is about whether a proposed decision/meeting will go ahead as proposed on September 7.  So, because there is a due date, people around the world are watching with bated breath.

Yesterday, shares tumbled in price following news that not only was Qatar opposing the merger but Norway had now enjoined the opposition. Norway's oil-based sovereign wealth fund has been in the market buying shares and, while their holding is a long way off that of the Qatar's, their stance on the merger is significant and influential.

Another influential with a negative view to the proposed merger is PIRC - the UK's leading independent research and advisory consultancy providing services to institutional investors on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.  PIRC has outlined to investors a number of reasons why the merger should be opposed.

Meanwhile, over in Qatar they are hitching up their skirts or rolling up their sleeves - depending on your metaphorical view.  Qatar is not happy with the merger because the pay-off for them is not as good as it should and could be.  However, Qatar has provided assurances to Xstrata that, in the event the proposed merger is not given the go-ahead, then it will up its stake in Xstrata.  Between the devil and the deep blue sea?  Xstrata currently seems to lie somewhere between Glencore and Qatar.

So in all this pushing and shoving, Glencore becomes the focus of the wait and see game.  With opposition to the merger mounting, will Glencore hold its ground or will it increase its offer in some way or another?  Or will it give the Kenny Rogers response?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 22 October 2010

Foreign investment in Australia


Overseas/Foreign investment has been a factor in Australian economic history since white settlement began.  However, foreign investment in Australia is occurring in a different context from very before: globalisation; sovereign wealth funds; burgeoning markets; free trade across the world; transitioning empires on the Pacific Rim; and a high Aussie $.


I intend this post to become a Post of Record.  I am kicking it off with links to comment about foreign investment from China and Spain.  Networkers, if you wish to contribute to this record, please forward information to misseaglesnetwork(at)gmail(dot)com.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

CANADA

CHINA

SPAIN

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Stock of Foreign Investment in Australia by Country, 20091 
Table (converted to .jpeg) from here.


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Please help Miss Eagle to keep this Post of Record
up-to-date and relevant
by sending fresh and appropriate material to
misseaglesnetwork(at)gmail(dot)com



$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

Chinese investment in Australia: will future interests conflict?


It ill behoves me to draw attention to statements by a former economic adviser to George W. Bush.  But here you are, Networkers.

I am not one to get nervous or up-tight about foreign investment in Australia.  We whitefellas took over lock, stock, and economic barrel and didn't go away - so howzat for foreign investment!  

However, we Anglo-Celts and those who don't mind living with us dominate.  Some of us would like to keep our autonomy and self-determination (yeah, I know, we are not good at allowing the same processes to the First Nations but I'm fighting for that, too).  

Trouble is that I don't have a lot of confidence in Australian assertiveness in foreign relations.  We like to big note ourselves as tilters at authority - but we are not, you know. 

Someone once wrote - it might have been Sol Encel who did a lot of good stuff on Australians and authority - that in Australia anyone in a blue hat can direct the traffic.  Ever noticed that?  If there is need and someone just gets out and starts directing people, we follow.  

As a nation, we are great forelock tuggers.  First of all, we tugged it to England and Empire. And many still do.  For the past sixty years or so we have been tugging it to the USA and have become part of its Empire. I think if a referendum was held to-morrow for Australia to become the 51st state of the USA instead of just a colony, the proposal would get up.  

But now China is the emerging imperial power - and it is buying into Australia, just as England and the USA have done in the past.  But times they are a'changing.  China has a lot of mouths to feed.  China is not a democracy.  With England and the USA, we had distinct ethnic and language ties.  Except for the increasing number of Chinese Australians who are still a minority and a long intertwining of history , we don't have the same common heritage.

My concern is how assertive Australian governments and corporations are prepared to be on behalf of their own people, their own nation. 

For instance, in the matter of Food Security:  

Food Security, because of population growth and global warming, is set to become an issue even in a prosperous country like Australia.  There is considerable Chinese investment in agricultural holdings in Australia.  If we have need in this country and China has need in its country, will China still be allowed to export its Australian-grown and manufactured food to its homeland from Australia?  This is what bothers me.  

Are we able to withstand the blandishment of the renminbi.  For example, take the ritual courting movements of Rio Tinto and China in the last year or two - and it managed to continue while Rio's executives were languishing in prison on corruption charges!

On the Liverpool Plains in NSW, where landowners in one of Australia's richest foodbowls have been doing battle against miners, the intruders have not only been our own BHP Billiton but Shenhua.  These resource buccaneers claim they are only exploring - but this is not true.  These titans are very sure they will hit pay-dirt and then more of our beautiful food-producing landscape will succumb to the unsightliness and horribleness of the open-cut pit mine.

In this post-election period, there has been much discussion on the topic of transparency.  I would like to see transparency in the matter of our foreign relations - both from our government but also from business. I want to see government and business taking their roles as Australians seriously.  I want to know that Australian governments and corporations are not on sale to the highest bidder.  I want to know that Australians come first with them - even above the almighty dollar and yuan.  I want to know that the needs of this nation and its people will be given the highest priority by its government and its corporations.

In short, I don't want to see kow-towing and obsequity.

Further reading:

Total Pageviews